What motivates this thread is an animus, a barely covered rage against that cheatin' broad. (Witness Buddha's bad temper.) The only way to punish her, however, involves punishing a child who did no cheatin'. The outraged "daddy," however, did not go without sex. The urge to strike out at a child does not exactly endear him either to me or the average judge.
So as long as the male was "gettin some" then it not matter a bit that the child isn't his, he should just pay up and be thankful he was gettin some.
Please.