[Mamzelle]

Presently the law allows for exactly what you write, albeit not as directly. If a woman's husband fathers other children, her household income can and should go to raise those children. The abiding interest of the law is the welfare of the child.

What motivates this thread is an animus, a barely covered rage against that cheatin' broad. (Witness Buddha's bad temper.) The only way to punish her, however, involves punishing a child who did no cheatin'. The outraged "daddy," however, did not go without sex. The urge to strike out at a child does not exactly endear him either to me or the average judge.

[Phantom Lord]

The outraged "daddy," however, did not go without sex.

So as long as the male was "gettin some" then it not matter a bit that the child isn't his, he should just pay up and be thankful he was gettin some.

[BuddhaBoy]

Bad temper? I'm laughing my ass of at you, wondering if I should be flattered for all this attention you give me.

Please.