Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jael
"They of course would not believe that was speaking about Christ. But it is speaking to God having a son."

I'm fairly certain that most Jews would here again disagree with this point and even if they acknowledged that God had a son (which, here again, I don't think that they do), this has nothing to do with believing that Christ came in the flesh, which, under the interpretation you've laid out, is the Scriptural grounds for whether or not one is the follower of an antichrist.

Here again, Jews do not believe that Christ was either God's Son or that He came in the flesh as the Messiah or as God.
266 posted on 12/16/2002 9:49:21 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]


To: Angelus Errare
That's not what I said

under the interpretation you've laid out, is the Scriptural grounds for whether or not one is the follower of an antichrist.

I said, according to the Koran's lies about Jesus Christ and what Scripture says, they are an antichrist religion.

1 John 2:22  Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.

The Jew, beloved of God, the apple of his eye, does not deny the Father. Amen.

267 posted on 12/16/2002 9:56:32 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson