Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Conservatives dispute Bush’s portrayal of Islam
The Indian Express ^ | 12/9/02 | Dana Milbank

Posted on 12/09/2002 7:38:48 AM PST by 1bigdictator

US Conservatives dispute Bush’s portrayal of Islam

Dana Milbank

Washington, December 8 PRESIDENT Bush finds himself in a rare disagreement with Conservatives in his party over his efforts to portray Islam as a peaceful religion that is not responsible for anti-American terrorism. In a score of speeches since the September 11, 2001, attacks, Bush has called for tolerance of Muslims, describing Islam as ‘‘a faith based upon peace and love and compassion’’ and a religion committed to ‘‘morality and learning and tolerance.’’

But a large number of foreign policy hawks — some of them with advisory roles in the Bush administration — have joined religious conservatives in taking issue with Bush’s characterisations. While most of them understand the political rationale for Bush’s statements — there’s no benefit in antagonising Muslim allies such as Pakistan and Indonesia — they say the claim is dishonest and destined to fail. For Bush and for the country, the outcome of the argument is crucial.

The administration, and moderate governments in Arab and Muslim nations, are struggling to prevent the war on terrorism from becoming what Osama bin Laden wants: a war of civilisation between the Judeo-Christian West and a resentful and impoverished Muslim world. Calling Islam a peaceful religion ‘‘is an increasingly hard argument to make,’’ said Kenneth Adelman, a former Reagan official who serves on the Bush Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board.

‘‘The more you examine the religion, the more militaristic it seems. After all, its founder, Mohammed, was a warrior, not a peace advocate like Jesus.’’ Another member of the Pentagon advisory board, Eliot Cohen of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, wrote an article on the Wall Street Journal editorial page arguing that the enemy of the US is not terrorism ‘‘but militant Islam.’’ ‘‘The enemy has an ideology, and an hour spent surfing the Web will give the average citizen at least the kind of insights that he or she might have found during World Wars I and II by reading Mein Kampf or the writings of Lenin, Stalin or Mao.’’

Cohen acknowledges it is impolitic and ‘‘deeply uncomfortable’’ for the administration to say such things. ‘‘Nobody would like to think that a major world religion has a deeply aggressive and dangerous strain in it — a strain often excused or misrepresented in the name of good feelings. But uttering uncomfortable and unpleasant truths is one of the things that defines leadership,’’ he said.

At the same time, social conservatives are resisting Bush’s efforts to portray Islam in a favorable light. ‘‘Islam is at war against us,’’ Paul Weyrich, an activist who is influential in the White House, wrote recently.

‘‘I have had much good to say about President Bush in recent months. But one thing that concerned me before September 11 and concerns me even more now is his administration’s constant promotion of Islam as a religion of peace and tolerance just like Judaism or Christianity. It is neither.’’ — LATWP


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Maryland; US: Massachusetts; US: Michigan; US: New Hampshire; US: Pennsylvania; US: Texas; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bush; conservatives; islam; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321 next last
Comment #161 Removed by Moderator

To: Jael
12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.

Bingo!

162 posted on 12/15/2002 11:21:41 PM PST by BenR2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Jael
You think your not respecting me is a sign of my fall?

"Pride is excessive belief in one's own abilities, that interferes with the individual's recognition of the grace of God. It has been called the sin from which all others arise. Pride is also known as Vanity."

The first deadly sin.

163 posted on 12/15/2002 11:22:23 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Why lie about me Luis? What does it get you?

I posted the Koran from a Muslim source. If you disagree with it, contact them. One small verse was misquoted? And you ignore the REST of the verses that cry out for the blood of innocent people?

You are nothing but a fake.
164 posted on 12/15/2002 11:22:49 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
No, I asked if you are a racist. The Jim Jones Kool Aid remark is uncalled for. Hundreds of black people died and it's a joke to you? You use that phrase to imply stupidity?

I'm going to ignore your silly remarks about Christianity. Give us this last.
165 posted on 12/15/2002 11:25:08 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
Also interesting is the prophecy about Esau. He married one of Ihhmael's daughter. I think they also intermarried into Cain's family.
166 posted on 12/15/2002 11:27:18 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Jael
Also interesting is the prophecy about Esau. He married one of Ihhmael's daughter. I think they also intermarried into Cain's family.

Good point about Esau. Not sure about the part regarding marrying into Cain's family. (Cain's family would have been wiped out in the Flood.)

167 posted on 12/15/2002 11:29:50 PM PST by BenR2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: heidizeta
I am a Christian.

I don't witness hatred, nor do I need to lie about ohers to elevate my God. He is there already.

I am done with you, you are dishonest, and are doing Him a diservice.

You have yet to clarify your position, on whether Jews are the anti-Christ.

I don't waste my time with people who will not openly debate.


168 posted on 12/15/2002 11:33:36 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Jael
Are Jews the anti-Chrsit?
169 posted on 12/15/2002 11:34:23 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

Comment #170 Removed by Moderator

Comment #171 Removed by Moderator

To: Jael
"They say that Jesus Christ is not the Son of God come in the flesh."

"That creates a problem for your argument that they worship the same God as Christians."

You are talking about Jews there, aren't you?

172 posted on 12/15/2002 11:39:01 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: skull stomper
No, I am proving that zealots from either side of this conflict, wish to elevate this into mass carnage in the name of God.

I'm not buying.

173 posted on 12/15/2002 11:40:12 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: skull stomper
Don't waste your time. Scroll past, the way you step over dog turds without examining them closely.
174 posted on 12/15/2002 11:41:44 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Jael
The Kool-Aid remark has nothing to do with racism. Much as you would like to derail this "conversation" into that.

It has to do with blind followers.

175 posted on 12/15/2002 11:41:54 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Oh? You are now claiming that my posting what the Koran teaches is equal to the Islamic terrorist who murdered 3000 people?

How sick.
176 posted on 12/15/2002 11:42:14 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Here comes nothing to add to the debate.

Hey Travis! Are you still advocating the murder of millions in the name of God?
177 posted on 12/15/2002 11:42:50 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
Hmmm, I guess I should think on that longer. ;-)
178 posted on 12/15/2002 11:43:07 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

Comment #179 Removed by Moderator

To: Luis Gonzalez
And because that poster didn't spell something right, he/she is a blind follower?

Seems more like you were calling him/her stupid.
180 posted on 12/15/2002 11:45:17 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson