[harpseal]

Clearly I agree with your well stated discussion of the meaning of the Second Ammendment. Now the question boils dow2n to what do we as the peiople guaranteed a right do about a court system that has chosen to ignore that right. Should the Supremem court of the United States of America choose to grant cert in this case or some other definitive Second Ammendment case then clearly waiting for them to rule is the morally sound position due to the fact that all peaceful means of redress of grievences must be tried.

However, now is the time to plan your course of action should this usurpation of the rights of citizens be allowed to stand.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

[Citizen of the United States]

It is the moral and ethical responsibility of all citizens and all human beings to seek pacific settlement of disputes whenever such is both possible and feasible. In a Union such as ours -- and God keep it strong --, founded as it is upon the principle of rule of law, it is also one's civic responsibility, in addition to being a moral and ethical imperative.

In any event, the State of Ohio -- wherein I dwell -- provides for the eventuality of an unresponsive Government in its Constitution (speficially, Article I, section 2):

"All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their equal protection and benefit, and they have the right to alter, reform, or abolish the same, whenever they may deem it necessary [...]"