Replies

I don't want you banned. That's not the point. The point is, dragging arguments from one thread into another is a bogus tactic and Jim has made it clear he doesn't approve. If I can't appeal to your sense of decency perhaps I can appeal to your respect for Jim's wishes. If that fails then your character is apparent.

xJones, who started this nonsense (when it was clear you guys had no substantial arguments for the topic at hand) should direct you to the threads in question here on FR. I only keep my original work on my FR profile page. If he's got the links I wouldn't mind looking at them again myself.

Otherwise, talk about the article you posted and argue with me about that. I'm not turning this into another dogpile in spite of your ludicrous "warnings."

I don't want you banned. That's not the point. The point is, dragging arguments from one thread into another is a bogus tactic and Jim has made it clear he doesn't approve. If I can't appeal to your sense of decency perhaps I can appeal to your respect for Jim's wishes. If that fails then your character is apparent.

MY sense of decency? MY character? I'm not the one who supports the legalisation of the possession of child pornography. You have absolutely no right to lecture to me on either morality or decency, when you support such a thing.

If you want to avoid fighting with me, don't talk to me - you indicated you sheer boredom with doing so yesterday because I refused to let you off the hook. And you still have not answered yes or no to the question.

If Jim Rob wants to keep you here that's his affair, not something I shall comment on, nor feel qualified to comment on. However I regard it as a very low tactic on your part, indicative of your low character, to try and intimidate me by invoking him, something which I have not done to you.

I have no desire to talk to someone who I regard as beyond the pale. I would be happy to debate the whole Keynesian issue with someone else, but you are morally offensive. It was bad enough you attempted a smear on Ronald Reagan, the fact that you can't issue a straight answer on the possession of child pornography, and now trying to threaten me with words about Jim Rob means you are utter scum.

As I say, if you want to avoid a fight, don't talk to me. I have nothing to say to you except my utter contempt and scorn.

Ivan

I see, you still refuse to answer whether or not you support the dissemination of child pornography.

Your silence speaks volumes.

As to your other little digs at me on this thread, they are rather laughable. Do try harder, if you want to rile me.