Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defensive gun use in U.S probably more common than criminal gun use
Lubbock Avalanche Journal (commentary) | 12/08/2002 | Armstrong Williams

Posted on 12/08/2002 2:26:46 PM PST by Bob Mc

Simple metal propulsion. It's what makes bullets fly out of guns with such severe force. It also ushered in the era of modern warfare by allowing strangers to kill other strangers with heretofore-unknown efficiency.

Simple metal propulsion was the common denominator in the sniper attacks, the Columbine massacre and the recent Wichita massacre, where Reginald and Jonathan Carr kidnapped five people, pulled off onto an abandoned soccer field and then shot each of them in the back of the head.

Indeed, simple metal propulsion can be a horrifying proposition. So it is easy to understand why some oppose the concept and denounce guns.

But it is not enough to point out the destructive capacity of guns. One must argue in terms of alternatives. That is to say, one must consider whether the world would be safer without guns. All other arguments exist in a vacuum.

Contrary to anecdotal evidence, there is ample scientific research that gun ownership makes our society safer. According to a 1993 survey conducted by Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck, approximately 2 million law-abiding citizens per year use guns to resist crimes.

As Kleck observed, "...there seems little legitimate scholarly reason to doubt that defensive gun use is very common in the U .S., and that it probably is substantially more common than criminal gun use.This should not come as a surprise, given that there are far more gun owning crime victims than there are gun-owning criminals and that victimization is spread out over many different victims, while offending is more concentrated among a relatively small number of offenders."

Get it? Guns give victims the ability to fight back against violent criminals. And whereas strict gun control measures would not be likely to inhibit criminals (they do, after all, break the law for a living), it would strip law-abiding citizens of the ability to defend themselves,against violent attacks.

Still, the opposition to simple metal propulsion is understandable. In this country, everyone owns a television set and we increasingly learn through images, rather than words. Images of gun violence can convey a wide range of visceral emotion. But the one thing images cannot do is articulate meaning. Images cannot consider the alternatives.

Images cannot convey what scientific research has long since discerned: Our country is safer with guns, and efforts to restrict gun ownership should be limited strictly to criminals , not law-abiding citizens.

ARMSTRONG WILLIAMS' column is distributed by the Los Angeles Times Syndicate. Write to him at P.O. Box 33085, Washington, D.C. 20033. E-mail: arightside@aol.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; secondamendment

1 posted on 12/08/2002 2:26:46 PM PST by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *bang_list

2 posted on 12/08/2002 2:28:28 PM PST by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
..



Images cannot convey what scientific research has long since discerned: Our country is safer with guns, and efforts to restrict gun ownership should be limited strictly to criminals , not law-abiding citizens.






..
3 posted on 12/08/2002 2:32:58 PM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
It amazes me that the most prolific gun control advocates are elected politicians. It is not due to constiuent pressure either, they are fully aware that they are con artists on the taxpayer dole and don't want anyone to finally get fed up enough to impose "term limits" on their lying, tax stealing @sses!!!!!
4 posted on 12/08/2002 2:37:41 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: technochick99; dbwz; basil; Hotline
bump
5 posted on 12/08/2002 2:48:10 PM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Mc

http://www.armstrongwilliams.com

6 posted on 12/08/2002 2:52:03 PM PST by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Mc; Sir Gawain
...there seems little legitimate scholarly reason to doubt that defensive gun use is very common in the U .S., and that it probably is substantially more common than criminal gun use....

Right!
Just read the "armed citizen" section in the NRA publications for good information

7 posted on 12/08/2002 3:08:58 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Mc
According to the Ninth Circus, defensive use of a gun IS criminal use of a gun.
8 posted on 12/08/2002 3:26:43 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama
It's always nice to see another voice in the media get it right!
9 posted on 12/08/2002 6:29:36 PM PST by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson