[sarcasm]

This is my state, not yours, and I know what the conditions are here.

As I recall, you were pretty quick to tell New Yorkers that the just had to vote for Pataki when you admitted your ignorance of the conditions here. Can you say hypocrite?

[Miss Marple]

Apples and oranges, sarcasm. If you will recall, I made the case that the Clintons could not be allowed to be seen as kingmakers. Pataki won by a large margin, the Clinton candidate was abandoned in foolish pursuit of a victory over Jeb Bush, and the Clintons are again shown to be a Jonah to candidates.

Pataki won by a fairly large margin, so a great many New Yorkers apparently agreed with me. I hope you were satisfied with your vote, however you cast it.

However, I did not claim to know anything about conditions in New York. I simply pointed out the national effect if the Clinton candidate won. Because New Yorkers voted for Pataki, I am quite grateful. This does not mean that I think Pataki is a conservative, but rather that I think he was helpful in marginalizing the Clintons.

And why are you here anyway, bringing this up on an immigration thread? Still bitter, I presume.