Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
Truly, I hope uprisings will keep this from being costly not just in Iraq but Iran, N. Korea, Syria, Palestine and anywhere terrorism has found a sponsor.

Reading now The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq by Kenneth M. Pollack. From this reading, I conclude that Saddam's first priority is and has always been his personal security. Toward this end he devotes massive resources. The liklihoods seem quite low that his overthrow can be accomplished by an uprising of the Kurds or the Shi'ah in the south, or by coup or assassination.

In the U.N. Security Council, Russia, France and China, for various reasons, all oppose Saddam's overthrow by the U.S. military and they will use the appointment of U.N. inspectors and delaying tactics to prevent it.

Containment has fallen apart and deterrance won't work if he develops a nuclear capability, which he will with time.

The Arab nations in the area, on the other hand, would not oppose the U.S. or U.N. taking him down militarily IF such action were quick, decisive, overwhelming. They will not support continued sanctions, which have lost their teeth in any case.

144 posted on 12/08/2002 7:05:37 AM PST by Phaedrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Phaedrus
Thank you for your post!

The Arab nations in the area, on the other hand, would not oppose the U.S. or U.N. taking him down militarily IF such action were quick, decisive, overwhelming.

Absolutely! That is how it must be.

145 posted on 12/08/2002 8:58:39 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson