Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sauropod
Longhi restated his ruling from June 2000 that Piscataway had a legitimate purpose in taking the 75-acre tract...

"Legitimate purpose"? How does that compare with "compelling interest," may I ask?

Has the law changed that much?

4 posted on 12/07/2002 5:41:34 AM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Illbay
Yes, my friend.

The State thinks that all property ultimately belongs to them and they let us own it on suffrage. 'Pod

5 posted on 12/07/2002 5:43:12 AM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Illbay
"Legitimate purpose"? How does that compare with "compelling interest," may I ask?

Hey, it's a Jersey judge in a Jersey courtroom. What more needs to be said.

42 posted on 12/07/2002 11:31:02 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Illbay
The legitimate purpose is hiking trails? Wreck a family farm for hiking trails?

When do we start calling each other comrade?

BTW: Does the Halber family owe a whole bunch of taxes or what? Where's the justification for this land grab?[hiking trails?]

52 posted on 12/07/2002 2:38:06 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson