Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blix: U.N. Won't Reveal Iraq Arms Secrets
AP | 12/07/02

Posted on 12/07/2002 2:28:39 AM PST by kattracks

UNITED NATIONS Dec. 7 — On the eve of Iraq's declaration of its weapons programs, chief U.N. inspector Hans Blix said Friday that U.N. experts will keep secret all sensitive material on nuclear, chemical and biological weapons in the massive report even from the United States and other Security Council members.

Iraqi Ambassador Mohammed Al-Douri said Friday his government will hand over the declaration to inspectors in Baghdad at 8 p.m. local time on Saturday. He reiterated Iraq's claim that the country is now free of weapons of mass destruction, but said the declaration would contain "new elements."

The U.N. Security Council empowered the two main U.N. inspection bodies to take charge of the Iraqi declaration and eliminate material that could lead to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction before it is made public.

Blix told a news conference that he understood the Iraqi report would be in Arabic and English and contain more than 10,000 pages, which would require translation before an initial assessment could be made on which material is sensitive.

He said he would brief the council early next week on the contents of the report. The sheer length of the report would mean that it will take time to release the details.

Colombia's U.N. Ambassador Alfonso Valdivieso, the current council president, announced that the Security Council had asked the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission known as UNMOVIC, which Blix heads, and the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, which is responsible for nuclear inspections, to immediately review the document.

"All the governments are aware that they should not have access to anything that everyone else does not have access to," Blix said after discussing the handling of the declaration with the 15 council members at a closed-door meeting.

Council diplomats said Russia and other council members were concerned that the declaration might contain "recipes" for chemical and biological weapons, and other information that could lead to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Al-Douri said the declaration contains "a huge amount of information," some of which would not be made public.

Both the Iraqi envoy and the chief inspector addressed charges by the United States that Saddam Hussein's government is hiding weapons of mass destruction.

"We said again and again that we have no more destruction weapons at all, everything has been destroyed and we have no intention to do that again," the Iraqi envoy said. "If the Americans have this evidence, they have to tell the inspectors in Iraq to go find this evidence."

Blix denied that he was under any pressure from the United States, but stressed that Resolution 1441 adopted Nov. 8 to toughen U.N. inspections asks all 191 U.N. member states to provide information to help inspectors search for banned weapons.

"We want to have recommendations from member governments what we should do," Blix said.

The chief inspector was asked about reports that the United States was pressing for the inspectors to question Iraqi scientists outside the country.

"We are not going to abduct anybody, and we're not serving as a defection agency," Blix said.

Under Resolution 1441, Iraq has until Sunday to submit a full and complete disclosure of its chemical, biological and nuclear programs.

Blix updated the council Friday on the work of his inspection teams so far in Iraq. Inspectors returned to Iraq last month after nearly four years. "They have done a good professional job," he said.


Copyright 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: mhking
I think our president will act on Monday... just a hunch.

The date, Dec. 8th will be held to.

I believe that POTUS 43 is of the same cloth as X-41. They don't back down from a threat or the stinking UN.

21 posted on 12/07/2002 5:18:49 AM PST by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeProfessor
Keep in mind that anything shared with the security council will be shared with China.

I really doubt that Iraq has anything that China doesn't already have more and better. China probably sold them some of the stuff in the first place.

a.cricket

22 posted on 12/07/2002 5:22:02 AM PST by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
I recall during the Clinton Impeachment hearing, that the guys representing Clinton had reems and reems of thick binders full of so called information.

It turns out that they were for the most part newspapers clippings from NYT,Washington Post and any other rags that defended him.

My guess is that this is going to be much the same case. The sad thing is that it will be in part the same newspapers again.

23 posted on 12/07/2002 5:35:41 AM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The u.n.itself is in breach and in cahoots with sodomy.
24 posted on 12/07/2002 6:39:48 AM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Blix is as arrogant as an English lord.

I hope Bush provides Annan and Blix the necessary reality therapy. The founding of the UN was bought with the blood of a million Americans in World War II and paid for by three generations of Americans who have contributed one-quarter of its budget and hosted its corrupt, felonious bureaucracy and delegates ever since and who were attacked on September 11, resulting in 3,000 deaths, $50 billion in property damage, and a $300 billion loss to our economy to date.

Time out.

The notion that a SWEDE should be lecturing an American on any subject is ridiculous. The Swedes were Hitler's armorer and cheerleader in World War II, but were too cowardly to share a foxhole with the Germans, nonetheless. I have more respect for the Nazi bastards we killed than the Swedes: At least the Germans took a stand.




25 posted on 12/07/2002 6:50:11 AM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Remind me again, somebody, what the whole point of this charade was?

(Rhetorical question.)

26 posted on 12/07/2002 6:50:40 AM PST by Publius Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Sawon the news this morning that Iraq had given a copy of the WMD declaration to the press. Even Sadam bypasses the UN.
27 posted on 12/07/2002 6:56:16 AM PST by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right
You're 100% correct, IMO.
28 posted on 12/07/2002 7:10:25 AM PST by Delmarksman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus
Just buying time with euros and American libs while we do the military buildup in the region. (Not a rhetorical answer.)
29 posted on 12/07/2002 7:24:27 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Delmarksman
If Adolf Hitler asked (ordered) Blix to turn over the search team's findings to us, he would comply. But he won't respond to a request from mere Americans. He's got to maintain his self-respect, after all.
30 posted on 12/07/2002 7:39:28 AM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

"We want to have recommendations from member governments what we should do," Blix said.

"The United States was pressing for the inspectors to question Iraqi scientists outside the country."

"We are not going to abduct anybody, and we're not serving as a defection agency."

Oh nevermind.
31 posted on 12/07/2002 7:47:15 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Agreed.

Uuck the FN.

32 posted on 12/07/2002 8:14:15 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
Hans Blix has no controlling legal authority to keep the declaration from the Council. /sarcasm

Blix is in material breach so let's bomb his sorry ass too.

33 posted on 12/07/2002 8:15:31 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Who trained Blix anyway, Scott Ritter?
34 posted on 12/07/2002 12:01:22 PM PST by LaGrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
LOL! That's a riot!
35 posted on 12/07/2002 1:04:00 PM PST by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
Yeah, he could write what the U.N. team did in one word , nothing.What's with 1000000000 pages? They show on shred of meat and they're caput.
36 posted on 12/07/2002 1:09:06 PM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: *UN_List
bump
37 posted on 12/07/2002 1:09:56 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: airborne
LOL!
38 posted on 12/07/2002 1:17:55 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TennesseeProfessor
"Keep in mind that anything shared with the security council will be shared with China."

Surely this was forseen when Resolution 1441 was drafted. Why should it be an issue now? Why was it not an issue during the previous inspection regime when actual WMD programs were found (Supergun, chemical weapons, nuclear weapons components).

China already has nuclear weapons; and if certain rumors are to be believed, they are now modeled after the latest designs from Los Alamos. How can the Iraqui stuff be better?
39 posted on 12/07/2002 1:19:16 PM PST by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Amen. The UN is a J-O-K-E. I'm tiring of these 3rd world backwoods a**holes trying to take a piece of my pie....
40 posted on 12/07/2002 1:27:42 PM PST by WyCoKsRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson