Skip to comments.
Blix: U.N. Won't Reveal Iraq Arms Secrets
AP
| 12/07/02
Posted on 12/07/2002 2:28:39 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: mhking
I think our president will act on Monday... just a hunch.
The date, Dec. 8th will be held to.
I believe that POTUS 43 is of the same cloth as X-41. They don't back down from a threat or the stinking UN.
21
posted on
12/07/2002 5:18:49 AM PST
by
johnny7
To: TennesseeProfessor
Keep in mind that anything shared with the security council will be shared with China. I really doubt that Iraq has anything that China doesn't already have more and better. China probably sold them some of the stuff in the first place.
a.cricket
To: American in Israel
I recall during the Clinton Impeachment hearing, that the guys representing Clinton had reems and reems of thick binders full of so called information.
It turns out that they were for the most part newspapers clippings from NYT,Washington Post and any other rags that defended him.
My guess is that this is going to be much the same case. The sad thing is that it will be in part the same newspapers again.
23
posted on
12/07/2002 5:35:41 AM PST
by
mware
To: kattracks
The u.n.itself is in breach and in cahoots with sodomy.
To: kattracks
Blix is as arrogant as an English lord.
I hope Bush provides Annan and Blix the necessary reality therapy. The founding of the UN was bought with the blood of a million Americans in World War II and paid for by three generations of Americans who have contributed one-quarter of its budget and hosted its corrupt, felonious bureaucracy and delegates ever since and who were attacked on September 11, resulting in 3,000 deaths, $50 billion in property damage, and a $300 billion loss to our economy to date.
Time out.
The notion that a SWEDE should be lecturing an American on any subject is ridiculous. The Swedes were Hitler's armorer and cheerleader in World War II, but were too cowardly to share a foxhole with the Germans, nonetheless. I have more respect for the Nazi bastards we killed than the Swedes: At least the Germans took a stand.
To: kattracks
Remind me again, somebody, what the whole point of this charade was? (Rhetorical question.)
To: kattracks
Sawon the news this morning that Iraq had given a copy of the WMD declaration to the press. Even Sadam bypasses the UN.
27
posted on
12/07/2002 6:56:16 AM PST
by
airborne
To: Man of the Right
You're 100% correct, IMO.
To: Publius Maximus
Just buying time with euros and American libs while we do the military buildup in the region. (Not a rhetorical answer.)
To: Delmarksman
If Adolf Hitler asked (ordered) Blix to turn over the search team's findings to us, he would comply. But he won't respond to a request from mere Americans. He's got to maintain his self-respect, after all.
"We want to have recommendations from member governments what we should do," Blix said. "The United States was pressing for the inspectors to question Iraqi scientists outside the country."
"We are not going to abduct anybody, and we're not serving as a defection agency."
Oh nevermind.
31
posted on
12/07/2002 7:47:15 AM PST
by
D-fendr
To: Joe Boucher
32
posted on
12/07/2002 8:14:15 AM PST
by
rintense
To: wretchard
Hans Blix has no controlling legal authority to keep the declaration from the Council. /sarcasm
Blix is in material breach so let's bomb his sorry ass too.
33
posted on
12/07/2002 8:15:31 AM PST
by
rintense
To: kattracks
Who trained Blix anyway, Scott Ritter?
34
posted on
12/07/2002 12:01:22 PM PST
by
LaGrone
To: mhking
LOL! That's a riot!
To: American in Israel
Yeah, he could write what the U.N. team did in one word , nothing.What's with 1000000000 pages? They show on shred of meat and they're caput.
36
posted on
12/07/2002 1:09:06 PM PST
by
ChiMark
To: *UN_List
bump
To: airborne
LOL!
38
posted on
12/07/2002 1:17:55 PM PST
by
txhurl
To: TennesseeProfessor
"Keep in mind that anything shared with the security council will be shared with China."
Surely this was forseen when Resolution 1441 was drafted. Why should it be an issue now? Why was it not an issue during the previous inspection regime when actual WMD programs were found (Supergun, chemical weapons, nuclear weapons components).
China already has nuclear weapons; and if certain rumors are to be believed, they are now modeled after the latest designs from Los Alamos. How can the Iraqui stuff be better?
To: Joe Boucher
Amen. The UN is a J-O-K-E. I'm tiring of these 3rd world backwoods a**holes trying to take a piece of my pie....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson