Well, let's just take Supercat's point for example, that all states are entitled to equal representation. How is that an undeniable truth?
I doubt it is a 'basic principle of individual liberty'. It's an arguable point of exactly how our government should be structured.
I think I can make at least a plausible argument that Texas ought to have a bigger vote in the Senate than Vermont. I understand the arguments against it, but I'd hardly call it something which is obvious to all.
Then you should be able to understand my main point, and answer the question: - "Why would you, [or anyone] support such a violation of liberty?" - from my last post.