Thank you for bringing that up. There is a difference between protecting your own freedom and our own borders and invading other countries with preemptive strikes for monetary control and world domination. Liberterians are all for protecting our country against invasion by others who would conspire to take away our freedoms. They are against the latter. That is not pacifist.
Where is it written in the constitution that we should go around the world imposing our views on other countries?
"There is a difference between protecting your own freedom and our own borders and invading other countries with preemptive strikes for monetary control and world domination. Liberterians are all for protecting our country against invasion by others who would conspire to take away our freedoms. They are against the latter. That is not pacifist." I agree, but, to be fair, we should point out that many "l"ibertarians believe our border should be protected, while many "L"ibertarians believe in open borders. The official position of the LP is "free and open immigration." Personally, I think limiting immigration plays a big part in national security.