'Gay' Reaction to Mrs. Stachowicz’s Murder: Silence to Applause

Culture and Family Institute/ Concerned Women for America ^ | 12/5/02 | Allyson Smith

[Desdemona]

What is wrong with asking mainstream homosexual groups to condemn this murder by one of their own of a poor Catholic woman merely practicing her faith?

Nothing. Because if homosexuals were true to their own message of tolerance it would have happened already.

[Polycarp]

I never heard about the feces rubbing; where did you get that from?

Don't know much about homosexual behavior afterall, do you?

A study by McKusick, et al., of 655 San Francisco homosexuals reported that only 24 percent of the sample claimed to have been "monogamous" during the past year, and of this 24 percent, 5 percent drank urine, 7 percent engag-ed in sex involving insertion of a fist in their rectums, 33 percent ingested feces, 53 percent swallowed semen and 59 percent received semen in their rectums in the month just previous to the survey ("AIDS and Sexual Behavior Reported by Homosexual Men in San Francisco," American Journal of Public Health, December 1985, 75: 493-496; )

[UbIwerks]

Dead is dead, whether it was Stalin's machine or Cromwell's. When someone with a different ideology comes along and persecutes, tortures, and kills you, who cares what the name of the ideology de jour is?

You take content and nature out of ideologies and reduce everything to mere motions. Sounds like a variant of materialism to me. Homosexuality is by is a deadly perversion; heterosexuality is life creating.

[bourbon]

no problem, RWP.

I get trigger happy too sometimes. What can I say posting on FR is just so much darned fun! LOL!!!

[f.Christian]

Prior(11/20) thread... DU(link)---comment(nasty)!

[maxwell]

That's the sort of dishonest analysis that promotes closed-minded extremism and prevents honest discussion. No credible person asserts that hate crimes apply only to gay people, not even us 'pro-homosexualists'.

"Dishonest"? You'll have to justify your use of that word before some of us will begin to take you seriously... The only time I, and many others here as well, likely, hear about "hate crimes" (how I despise that phrase) is in the context of a homosexual or minority victim...

[maxwell]

However, I think the attitudes by some Christians toward gays is evil, and I'm not going to sit on my hands while that sort of vitriol is being promoted.

So "Christian witnessing" may as well be "that sort of vitriol"?

[maxwell]

If someone denied Christians jobs, reviled them for their 'sick' beliefs, knocked on their doors and asked them to renounce their scandalous lifestyles--that would be persecution.

Not analogous. The main premise of the Christian faith is not sex.

[maxwell]

If I were part of a group that totalled 2% of the population, I'd try NOT to piss off the other 98%.

Bwahaha... Well you might if you could get away with it.

It'd be kinda funny, actually, if it didn't p!ss me off so much-- an entire "culture" based on where weiners are and are not put...

[Right Wing Professor]

I was raised Catholic but haven't been to church in 25 years.

I'm relieved you ain't a Jesuit, actually. :-(

[RAT Patrol]

It has been my observation that the so-called "moderates" can be full of more sanctimony than either the left or the right. People are entitled to their opinions on moral issues. And the last time I checked, those same people have every right to VOICE those opinions!

[maxwell]

Turn it around. If a gay person came to your home and 'witnessed' his or her beliefs to you, and told you you were evil and bound for hell because of your heterosexual lifestyle, would that be vitriol?

Number one: I am not a pussy and I can take whatever heat, criticism, witnessing, vitriol, or nutpounding anybody wants to deliver, without my wittle feewings getting squooshed. And I won't have to run to the ACLU and tattle either.

Number two: I am also a civilized human being, and will not feel it necessary to murder someone on my doorstep, no matter how repulsive they are to me. (Unless they draw first. Now that's a different story.)

In other words, I ain't the thenthitive type.