Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers [Spoiler]
Home Theater Forum ^ | 5 Dec 2002 | Ron Epstein

Posted on 12/05/2002 11:03:56 AM PST by sourcery

The Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers





Cast (Major Roles Only)

Elijah Wood .... Frodo Baggins
Ian McKellen .... Gandalf the White
Viggo Mortensen .... Aragorn
Sean Astin .... Samwise 'Sam' Gamgee
Billy Boyd .... Peregrin 'Pippin' Took
Liv Tyler .... Arwen Undómiel
John Rhys-Davies .... Gimli, son of Glóin/Treebeard (voice)

Dominic Monaghan .... Meriadoc 'Merry' Brandybuck
Christopher Lee .... Saruman the White
Miranda Otto .... Éowyn
Brad Dourif .... Gríma Wormtongue
Orlando Bloom .... Legolas Greenleaf
Cate Blanchett .... Galadriel
Karl Urban .... Éomer
Bernard Hill .... Théoden, King of Rohan

Director:

Peter Jackson



A review by Ronald Epstein

One ring to rule them all,
One ring to find them,
one ring to bring them all and in
the darkness bind them.

I have just returned from a major city private studio screening of the most antipated film of this year. I'll cut to the chase and tell all of you up front that The Two Towers is indeed as sensational as some of the earliest reviews have indicated. Whether it's better than the first film is debatable -- but it certainly is just as good.

In what had to be the riskiest endeavor in the history of motion pictures, New Line Cinema took the gamble of a lifetime by greenlighting Peter Jackson's $310 million Lord Of The Rings epic. It would take a 15-month shoot for the director to lense the three films that make up J.R.R. Tolkien's mythical LOTR trilogy. Last year's first installment, Fellowship Of The Ring, became the second highest grossing film of 2001, grossing $860 million worldwide and garnering 13 Oscar nominations including Best Picture. Certainly not a bad payoff for a longshot.

The Two Towers picks up exactly where Fellowhip Of The Ring left off. Sadly, there is no opening narration by Cate Blanchett, but according to a recent interview, this is exactly the way Peter Jackson wanted the film to begin. Without giving away too much of the plot, I'll talk a little about the beginning of the film. Starting high above Middle Earth, the camera moves backwards against its snowy peaks. There's a flashback of Gandalf fighting the Balrog, but this time we find out what happens as they fall into the fiery depths. Suddenly, Frodo awakens as if it were all a dream. He is with Samwise Gamgee, almost exactly where we left them, but this time they are not alone. Gollum has found them, and its not long before the slithering creature pounces upon them, trying to steal his "precious" ring. Meanwhile, Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli set out in pursuit of the Orcs who have captured Merry and Pippin. Merry and Pippin narrowly escape the clutches of the Orcs only to find themselves in the thickened woods. So begins this nearly 3-hour adventure that is far more darker than the original film. Gone is the green Shire with all its charm. In fact, there is nothing charming about this film. It's so dark and brutal that viewers are literally brought to the edge of their seats with the film's high-tech battles that will have their jaws dropping to the floor.

So what impressed me most about this film? The fact that Peter Jackson has once again created a believable Middle Earth that seems to sprout from our most inner imaginations. My favorite scene in the entire film is one where Gollum leads Frodo and Samwise through a dangerous marsh with flaming fire and thick fog. The waters that surround it reveal the faces of the dead. Suddenly, overhead, a Ringwrathe appears riding a winged creature. As our heroes hide in the marshes, you can feel the chills running up your spine as the swooping sounds of the bird's large swing span seem to pan across the theater. Of course, nothing can come close to the film's climatic Battle for Helms Deep. You can feel the intensity building as you hear a thunderous roar while watching an endless black sea of an approaching Orc army, stomping their weapons across the ground. The battle itself is perhaps one of the grandest of its kind ever seen with its onslaught of slinging arrows and ladders of Orcs that catapult themselves up the fortress walls.

The CGI is every bit as impressive as I had expected it to be, most notably, the creature Gollum, who is perhaps the most amazing CGI character ever brought to the screen. Sometimes hideous, other times lovable, this creature proves that CGI cannot only be tastefully done, but such a character can dominate a film and actually be liked -- unlike that other CGI character we all hated from Star Wars: Episode I. The battle scenes with its thousands of CGI added armies looks quite believable here. The only problem I had was with the Treebeard, one of the Ents who are considered the shepherds of the forest. Though the walking and talking tree effects themselves were often quite good, these weren't my favorite scenes in the movie. They often felt out of place. The effect scenes involving Pip and Merry being held within its branches often look as if it was being done in front of blue screen.

Another problem with The Two Towers is that it tends to drag in many areas. Though Fellowhip of the Ring took its time telling a story, this film gives us epic battle scenes sandwiched between scenes of weighted dialogue that just seem to go on forever. There's some really great side stories involving Grima Wormtongue, the King's advisor, but some of it seems to go on much longer than it should. I can imagine how hard it must be to properly pace a film that has such an immense story to tell.

As expected, Howard Shore's score so beautifully compliments this film. The musical theme doesn't seem to be much different here than The Fellowhip of the Ring, but I was sort of taken back by a beautiful song that appears on the film's soundtrack, called Gollum's Song. Those of you that have heard it know how haunting its words are, and I was sort of hoping that the song could be used somewhere in the context of the film. Unfortunately, you'll only hear it if you sit through the film's ending credits.

Once again the camera twists and turns from different angles giving us those really cool rush-in closeups. It's not done as impressively as the first film, and there's less of that kind of camera work here. I think Jackson was smart to keep that kind of camera work low-key as too much of it gets to be tiresome. Frodo never puts the ring on his finger, so we don't see any of the chilling images that were so memorable in the first film. I think most of the "wow" factor here comes from the battle for Helms Deep. It's a long, breathtaking battle that will be talked about for a long time.

Audience reaction? The audience was mostly quiet throughout. There were many chuckles that came from watching Gimli make a pig out of himself with food or not being able to stand high enough to see an approaching army. Many of the gasps I heard from the crowd came when Legolas mounted his horse. It's a feat that must be seen to believed! I also heard many of the women doing a lot of "oohs" and "awwws" during the scenes with Gollum. The creature can really be cute at times. As the credits rolled, the audience clapped loudly. The exit chatter I heard was very positive.

Despite these very few nitpicky complaints, I managed to find The Two Towers to be a grand epic, wide in scope, and intimately poetic.

On a scale of 1-5, I give this film a 5.

Opens December 18th, 2002


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: geeks; lotr; socialmisfits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: sourcery
Another problem with The Two Towers is that it tends to drag in many areas. Though Fellowhip of the Ring took its time telling a story, this film gives us epic battle scenes sandwiched between scenes of weighted dialogue that just seem to go on forever.

Oh great. Another snoozer. I've read and re-read the books and thoroughly enjoyed them a half dozen times but the first edition of this cinema adaptation put me to sleep in 30 minutes.

21 posted on 12/05/2002 11:42:12 AM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RMDupree
I've already bought my tickets for the noon showing on the 18th (took the day off)!!!

My wife and I, ditto, verbatim.

Dan

22 posted on 12/05/2002 11:44:05 AM PST by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
WOW!!

Thanks for the links. I missed the show. I wish I had seen it. I was just talking to someone the other day wondering if there would be any of those type specials like there was for FOTR.

Legolas' mount is sweet.

23 posted on 12/05/2002 11:45:53 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
Didn't you get the memo? It's open season on Jews. And the population has recovered since the last hunting season.

But seriously, the goblins in HP are ugly, but not evil. And they don't lend money at interest, at least not so far.

24 posted on 12/05/2002 11:45:59 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I guess that Legolas is a stickler for mounting a horse from the correct side. He approaches from the "off" side and swings under the horse's neck and up onto his back (and in front of Gimli). Obviously, it's a CGI Orlando Bloom, but it catches you by surprise. It's a nice visual reminder that Legolas isn't human.
25 posted on 12/05/2002 11:47:41 AM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort; JenB
Oh great. Another snoozer. I've read and re-read the books and thoroughly enjoyed them a half dozen times but the first edition of this cinema adaptation put me to sleep in 30 minutes.

Isn't being an idiot and a boor good enough? Where does this need to share it come from?

Dan

26 posted on 12/05/2002 11:47:52 AM PST by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sourcery; Admin Moderator
Thanks for posting this, but I wonder if a (spoiler) warning would be called for here in the thread title.

Hard as it may be to believe, there some who haven't read the book and don't know what happens to the various wizards in The Two Towers.



27 posted on 12/05/2002 11:49:27 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Dan, you really must allow people to have different tastes... you keep getting in these flame wars over folk not liking it!
28 posted on 12/05/2002 11:51:33 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Spreading these movies over 3 years prevents withdrawl in my opinion. You get excited to see the movie, that last about a month, you wait another 6 and rent the DVD, then you have the last 5 months to anticipate the sequel. Perfect. Anyone know any details about the actor's contracts? Do they all get a piece of the gross? I doubt the studio thout that the 3 movies combined would gross well over $2 Billion world wide. Even if each main character gets 1% of the gross, that's over $20 Million a piece. Almost unbelievable. You wonder who will come of this as the "Mark Hammil", and never really work again, as apposed to who will be the "Harrison Ford" and make a ton more cash. Also, will the LOTR franchise as a whole out-gross Star Wars? It should, mainly because the movies are far superior.
29 posted on 12/05/2002 11:53:23 AM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
I've read and re-read the books and thoroughly enjoyed them a half dozen times but the first edition of this cinema adaptation put me to sleep in 30 minutes.

I had the opposite reaction of yours.

When I found myself in the hospital in June '01, I figured I'd read the Trilogy since the movie was opening in a few short months. I struggled to finish and even dreaded going into the second and third book.

I waited until the DVD came out and enjoyed it immensely.
No bad songs or poetry.

One of the few times I thought a film was superior to the book.
(JAWS being the obvious other)

30 posted on 12/05/2002 11:54:15 AM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

31 posted on 12/05/2002 11:55:14 AM PST by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Sorry you feel that way. I think this is a film where, if someone is THAT negative and snide, it says something about him.

And when someone swaggers into a group of people sharing their enjoyment of something, and jaws about his boorish inability to understand (who asked?).

You're too easy on the louts. Sorry you felt the need to correct my attempt to be the bouncer.

Dan
32 posted on 12/05/2002 11:58:18 AM PST by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
I thought that anything with magic in it was satanic? If not, then why do some people get so upset about Dungeons & Dragons and Harry Potter?

33 posted on 12/05/2002 11:58:36 AM PST by Karsus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Trailer here:
http://www.apple.com/trailers/newline/the_two_towers/
34 posted on 12/05/2002 11:58:37 AM PST by aught-6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
It's a nice visual reminder that Legolas isn't human.

Hey, we elves need love too!
35 posted on 12/05/2002 12:00:32 PM PST by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: aught-6
I've got that, Thanks for posting it!
36 posted on 12/05/2002 12:00:37 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Thanks.



37 posted on 12/05/2002 12:08:06 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Isn't being an idiot and a boor good enough? Where does this need to share it come from?

Physician, heal thyself.....

38 posted on 12/05/2002 12:08:14 PM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Big cat! You haven't read the trilogy?

Why, that's practically sac-reeeligious!

= D

Can't wait can't wait can't wait can't wait!!
39 posted on 12/05/2002 12:13:29 PM PST by Mr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
From the article:

To cap it all, the races that Tolkien has put on the side of evil are then given a rag-bag of non-white characteristics that could have been copied straight from a BNP leaflet. Dark, slant-eyed, swarthy, broad-faced - it's amazing he doesn't go the whole hog and give them a natural sense of rhythm.

Attornies from the National Association for the Advancement of Orcs will be calling Peter Jackson's office in the morning.

40 posted on 12/05/2002 12:14:37 PM PST by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson