Skip to comments.
Revolutionary New Theory For Origins Of Life On Earth
UK Royal Society ^
| 12/4/2002
| Professor William Martin, Institut fuer Botanik III, University of Dusseldorf and Dr Michael Russell
Posted on 12/04/2002 12:23:13 PM PST by forsnax5
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
For those who appreciate irony... :)
1
posted on
12/04/2002 12:23:13 PM PST
by
forsnax5
To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; PatrickHenry; jennyp; balrog666; general_re; Right Wing Professor; ...
Another outrageous theory surfaces!
2
posted on
12/04/2002 12:27:01 PM PST
by
forsnax5
To: forsnax5
Oh my.
So few straws, so many grasps....
3
posted on
12/04/2002 12:29:24 PM PST
by
azhenfud
To: forsnax5
They provided the right microenvironment for chemical reactions to take place. I don't think so. They also provided limited reactants. If it was likely then it should be fairly easy to do in the lab.
4
posted on
12/04/2002 12:30:33 PM PST
by
AndrewC
To: forsnax5
living systems originated from inorganic incubators - small compartments in iron sulphide rocks So this is how the first vegatative soul came into being? Sheesh.
To: forsnax5
Or another surface theory.
To: forsnax5
Life in some microbial form is common to rock. Somewhere someone said the biomass of bacteria inside the rock of the earth is greater than the biomass of everything living on the surface [including you and your dog and the mold growing inside your refrigerator.]
Don't know if it's true or not, but it seems reasonable, and would make the odds of microbial life existing beyond earth in every rocky planet orbiting every star a certainty.
The popular idea that all life came from one primitive cell and ramified into species is basic to some origin hypotheses, but isn't necessary or even likely.
To: forsnax5
Again, scientists spend too much time looking backwards.
8
posted on
12/04/2002 12:36:58 PM PST
by
Consort
To: forsnax5
"
...rich in compounds such as hydrogen, cyanide, sulphides and carbon monoxide."
Ah, those essential compounds of life. What would we be without them???
9
posted on
12/04/2002 12:38:12 PM PST
by
azhenfud
To: RightWhale
I dunno -- when I was single I had some SERIOUS 'fridge mold going on. Named it "Fred" and taught it to bring me beer.
To: Aquinasfan
"So this is how the first vegatative soul came into being?"
Maybe that is where the Democraps come from!! It would seem so, where else could one gleen the saying "dumb as a box of rocks!!"
To: Aquinasfan
So this is how the first vegatative soul came into being? Sheesh.Iron sulphide(sulfide) AKA Fool's Gold
12
posted on
12/04/2002 12:40:31 PM PST
by
AndrewC
To: forsnax5
Wasn't this a Star Trek episode? The one where the microscopic, metallic lifeforms refer to humans as "ugly bags of mostly water"? (On the other hand, had they refered to them as "ugly bags of mostly water in crusty, black pantsuits"... But I digress.)
13
posted on
12/04/2002 12:41:10 PM PST
by
Redcloak
To: Redcloak
"ugly bags of mostly water in crusty, black pantsuits..."
Let me guess; Hillery?
14
posted on
12/04/2002 12:44:03 PM PST
by
azhenfud
To: forsnax5
Some writer, I can't remember his name right now, postulated that water created people to transport it from one place to another. The older I get and the more frequent my night time trecks to the head, the more I believe this theory.
To: forsnax5
Being science-challenged, I'll have to watch this debate from the sidelines. It's a good thing though to keep challenging standing precepts. It's a conceit to think that we know much about anything at this stage of our development and evolution.
To: RightWhale
The popular idea that all life came from one primitive cell and ramified into species is basic to some origin hypotheses, but isn't necessary or even likely. I'm not aware that any known bacteria have characteristics that would disqualify them from this hypothesis.
17
posted on
12/04/2002 12:49:39 PM PST
by
js1138
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
Life everywhere! Ping.
[This ping list for the evolution -- not creationism -- side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. If you want to be included, or dropped, let me know.]
To: Jimer
Again, scientists spend too much time looking backwards. And some spend too much time reading fairy tales.
To: rmmcdaniell
And some spend too much time reading fairy tales. And mythology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson