Replies

Please don't get overconfident. I am hearing more and more of those commercials for both of them and while I hate to say it, Suzy's are offensive,,she comes across as mean and others are saying the same thing. I think they have overdone it, both of them, there is an endless stream of anti Mary commercials that are too much. And we got a card in the mail for Suzy that was so negative,,had a pic of Mary sort of sneering with Hillary and Bill,,it was a paste up job and it was just plain horrid. Even hubby a repub said he didn't want to vote for Suzy. I think they underestimated the effect of the constant cat fighting. Now don't flame the messenger here,,just saying what I am seeing.

I respectfully disagree with you. I think one of the flaws in Woody Jenkins' campaign in 1996 was his unwillingness to be tough on Mary Landrieu's record. Most people don't know of her support for abortion on demand and federal funding of abortion and the morning after pill. Political junkies know about it and we may get tired of hearing about it. But the average citizen is very poorly informed and Landrieu's dissembling about her positions on every issue, especially right to life, have got to be set straight. These are not personal attacks. They don't try to smear her as crooked, as Landrieu is trying to do to Suzie Terrell with that ridiculous voting machine ad.

Don't fall for the liberal/media propaganda that every time a conservative highlights the record of the liberal, it is negative. Terrell is running an issue oriented campaign based on Landrieu's votes and record. What is negative about that?