Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
1. Sad story - thanks for the candor.

2. Evidence that birth control is risky.

3. You have one more child in your family that no one has the privilege of knowing - hope you meet him/her some day.

4. Since the surgery was to remove the IUD, the direct intent was not to kill the child. The child's death was a likely but undesired side effect. (Just as removing the ectoptic tube is different than killing the child inside the tube and removing him/her so that the tube can be saved).
70 posted on 12/03/2002 3:31:39 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Notwithstanding
One more thing: when we chose to use an IUD, I/we didn't realize that it is merely the earliest form of in situ abortifacient devices. I don't condone the use of IUD's either, now.
71 posted on 12/03/2002 3:36:28 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson