[MHGinTN]

I agree with you, Bella. Good on ya for speaking out. This is all about life support, and the life of the mother is to be respected and supported if endangered by ectopic pregnancy, which is a horrifically painful way to die, usually, based on medical evidence.

It would appear that CP is concerned for the children who might see the images and then ask questions, while PC has forgotten the children dismembered in abortuaries who will never see even a glimmer of a sunset or hear the faintest of bird song. But then, CP won't have to explain anything to those children ... while here on this plane.

[Bella_Bru]

I spoke up because disinformation (telling women that ectopic pregnancies are perfectly safe) is wrong, wrong, wrong.

[Notwithstanding]

Well, actually, two human lives are at risk. Executing one them should not be the solution, since doing so is saying that one life is more valuable than the other.

The law should not allow the execution of an inocent person even if the end in mind is saving a life. The direct taking of an innocent human life is never moral, and should not be legal.

[Notwithstanding]

I believe that removing the inflamed tube knowing the child will likely die as a result is moral, but killing the child directly to keep the tube intact is immoral.

Direct killing as an objective is not moral.