Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DAnconia55
The relevant part, ONCE AGAIN, in case you missed it before, is "UNREASONABLE".
315 posted on 12/03/2002 5:25:54 PM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: wimpycat
The relevant part, ONCE AGAIN, in case you missed it before, is "UNREASONABLE".

Ah, I see. So the statist interpretation is this : If one has a warrant, one can seize objects or people unreasonably.

LOL...

Either a Government official has to have a warrant to arrest you, or he does not. Either/Or. Choose. Now.

325 posted on 12/03/2002 5:33:08 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson