Landrieu's lame answer, an absurdity born out of arrogance and stupidity, reveals why Landrieu and the Democrats are KAPUT. FINIS. HISTOIRE. It was hard not to notice that the reporter who posed the question couldn't believe Landrieu's illogic--stupidity, really... Landrieu doesn't seem to understand that clintonian sleight of hand has become very old for 'the people of Louisiana.' Landrieu doesn't seem to understand that even her own constituency gets it now... What Landrieu said was this: No, she wouldn't support a Bush decision to go into Iraq if no weapons of mass destruction are found, but added, as if to assure us,that as a very important person who sits on very important committees that are privy to very important classified info, she is certain that Iraq does have weapons of mass destruction. Landrieu fails to understand that her own statement expressing certainty about the existence of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction renders her answer patently absurd...and renders her own very important self in the eyes of 'the people of Louisiana' quite dangerous. Landrieu fails to understand that even her most dimwitted, disinformed, demagogued-for-decades-by-democrats constituent understands on a gut level--and even without her own statement of certainty--that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and that, therefore, Landrieu--and the rest of the Democrats--and, frankly, anyone who pushed for the internally inconsistent construct lunacy called UN inspections--are patently unfit to lead, especially in a post-9/11 world. |
Q ERTY8 PING! |
