Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZULU
I think that if the people in a particular state wish to pass a law against sexual perverts, they have that right. The Supremes have supported laaws {sic}against Strip Joints {sic}. Whats {sic} the essential difference?

If they were indeed doing it in the privacy of their own home, it wouldn't really be an issue would it? In the latter case only the two perverts involved would know about it. They must have been doing it their back yard or in fornt {sic} of an open window where normal people were able to see them.

I would guess that would depend on your definition of "normal." So, what is normal to you and your high moral belief system? What if my wife and I engage in sodomy and you as a 'normal' person happen to be peeping in my bedroom window? Should my actions be illegal? And what if my wife and I are engaging in sex that has your stamp of approval while you as a "normal" person are peeping in my bedroom window? Should I again be arrested or should the "normal" person who is peeping in my bedroom window be arrested?

76 posted on 12/02/2002 12:30:59 PM PST by Station 51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Station 51
You're confusing "normal" with "common".

For example, cancer is common, but it is not normal.

81 posted on 12/02/2002 12:34:54 PM PST by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: Station 51
"I would guess that would depend on your definition of "normal." So, what is normal to you and your high moral belief system? What if my wife and I engage in sodomy and you as a 'normal' person happen to be peeping in my bedroom window? Should my actions be illegal? And what if my wife and I are engaging in sex that has your stamp of approval while you as a "normal" person are peeping in my bedroom window? Should I again be arrested or should the "normal" person who is peeping in my bedroom window be arrested?"

It isn't MY definition of "normal". Its the definition of nature and the overwhelming number of human societies which have existed at present and in the past. Homosexuality is a biological abberration which serves no purpose. If Nature and Nature's God had intended for humans and animals to be able to reproduce without two sexes, He would have worked it out that way.

People who go peeping into other people's windows shouldn't be surprised or shocked by what they see. That really is not the issue here. Personally, I don't care if a mature adult gets off using a coconut, as long as it is in private and the public can't see. The problem in the Texas case and in most recent such issues is that these perverts want permission to practise their abberrations in public, obtain social endorsement for their abberrations, and be free to recruit others to their freakish life style. But perhaps that is the very outgrowth of our society having grown more tolerant of these obnoxious deviants in the first place.


487 posted on 12/02/2002 8:59:29 PM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson