Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madg

NARTH Research Studies Published

 - In April, the peer-reviewed professional journal Psychological Reports published NARTH's survey of 206 sexual-reorientation therapists. In June, Psychological Reports published NARTH's survey of 882 dissatisfied homosexuals. A press release announced both studies.

What the Therapists Reported

The first article, entitled "Beliefs and Practices of Therapists Who Practice Sexual-Reorientation Therapy," was written by Joseph Nicolosi, Ph.D., A Dean Byrd, Ph.D. of the University of Utah, and Richard W. Potts, M.A., of Utah Valley Regional Medical Center.

Dr. Nicolosi is NARTH's president, and Dr. Byrd is the vice president.

"We wanted to conduct this survey in order to better understand what members of our psychotherapist community believe about conversion therapy and their treatment of dissatisfied homosexuals," said the authors.

They emphasized that the study was not a random survey, but it specifically sought out therapists who conduct reorientation therapy. Most such therapists said they believe the 1973 decision to remove homosexuality from the psychiatric manual was politically, and not scientifically motivated. Most believed that homosexuality is not genetically determined, but that it is a primarily developmental phenomenon which results from a combination of nature and nurture.

The therapists agreed that reorientation therapy is not appropriate for all clients. "Clients have a right to pursue a gay lifestyle," Dr. Nicolosi emphasized, "and change-type therapies should not be imposed on a client who is not receptive."

Two Types of Coercion

Yet there is an opposite type of coercion commonly being practiced, Dr. Nicolosi said; clients who seek change are being told that change is impossible, that their real nature is homosexual, and that they should grow more fully into a gay identity--which for them may be ego-dystonic.

"Therapists have an ethical obligation to respect their client's right to dignity and autonomy," Dr. Nicolosi stressed. "They have no right to tell clients that their religious convictions should be discarded, they were created homosexual, and that the client's only problem is lack of self-acceptance."

A significant minority of the therapists surveyed by NARTH (26%) were themselves ex-gay men and women.

What 882 Ex-Gays Reported

The second study, titled "Retrospective Self-Reports of Changes in Homosexual Orientation: A Consumer Survey on Conversion Therapy Clients," was written by the same three authors as the first NARTH study. Joseph Nicolosi was the Principal Research Investigator, and analysis of the data was performed by a group of statisticians at Brigham Young University.

The study surveyed 882 dissatisfied homosexual people, of whom 726 had received therapy from a professional therapist or pastoral counselor.

Over 67% of the participants indicated they were exclusively or almost exclusively homosexual at one time in their lives, while only 12.8% of them perceived themselves in this manner at the time of the survey.

Significantly, 45.4% of the exclusively homosexual participants reported having made major changes in their orientation.

On the other hand, 35.1% of the participants were unsuccessful in making significant changes.

Those participants who were successful reported statistically significant reductions in the frequency of their homosexual thoughts and fantasies. They also reported significant improvements in other important areas of their lives---particularly, their psychological, interpersonal, and spiritual well-being.

Copies of both published articles are available from NARTH for a suggested donation of $5 each.

13 posted on 12/01/2002 6:06:06 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Polycarp; madg
One of the studies cited by polycarp says this ---

"Significantly, 45.4% of the exclusively homosexual participants reported having made major changes in their orientation.
On the other hand, 35.1% of the participants were unsuccessful in making significant changes."

OK, so the bottom line here is that reparative therapy is successful for a significant number of people, and is a failure for a much smaller - yet still significant - number of people.

Well, duh! Alcoholics Anonymous and similar programs also have a significant number of both successes and failures. And drug-rehab programs have large numbers of each. So do convict-rehab programs. And let's not forget that chemotherapy and radiation therapy save the lives of large numbers of cancer patients, yet fail completely with a huge chunk - perhaps even a majority - of all cancer patients.

So do we hear calls for shutting down AA and drug-rehab and convict-rehab programs, and chemo- and radiation- therapy, based on the fact that they have significant failure rates? No? We don't? They why do we hear calls (from people on madg's side of the PC fence) for shutting down the ex-gay reparative therapy programs?

And madg (who, significantly, has not a thing to say in response to the well- documented scientific evidence presented in polycarp's rebuttals, other than to dismiss it all as "name-calling and propaganda") cites this quote in an earlier post of his ---

"... Since the 1980s the clinical literature contains many examples of gay men treated with psychoanalysis or dynamic psychotherapy [(IE: NARTH, et al) whose sexual orientation did not change during treatment, despite attempts to bring this about (Duberman 1991; McConaghy 1999)."

OK, so we see that Duberman and McConaghy have discovered "many examples of gay men treated ... [who] did not change during treatment ...". Well, like, so what? This claim of "many examples" of failure is certainly in keeping with the research done by the ex-gay therapists, who freely admit to a 35.1% failure rate. So this is not exactly a Startling Relevation from Duberman et al, now, is it?

And it's rather disingenuous - to say the least - for Duberman & Co. (or for someone who has perhaps lifted a quote from them out of context????) to merely note anecdotal information about the many failures and then say nothing about the much larger number of successes! Their statement is not much different than say, a statement like - "Since the 1920s the clinical literature contains many examples of alcoholics treated through AA programs who did not become ex-alcoholics". Or similar to say, a documentary entitled "American Military History 1775-2002" that spends 98% of its time on the Vietnam War.

15 posted on 12/01/2002 11:19:49 PM PST by CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson