Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S. Carolina: No Tattoo's Here!
CAPITALISTCHICKS.COM ^ | FR Post 12-1-2002 | Debbie Brannigan

Posted on 12/01/2002 1:24:01 PM PST by vannrox

S. Carolina: No Tattoo's Here!

Debbie Brannigan (Email Author)

"Never say never". That has been my mantra these days. Ten years ago it seems I had a never ending list of things that "I'll never (fill in blank)". One of those was "I'll never get a tattoo." I would have sworn to it back then. Well here I am, in my late 30's, getting a tattoo. It was not a rash decision made while finishing off rounds of tequila in the bar. No, actually, it was a very long thought process with much research. Those who know Tara and me personally know that we had a very rough and challenging time just a few years back. This tattoo was a personal marker of that time and how we came through it. Like most people who get tattoos, it is a very personal statement that marks a significant chapter of your life.

Perhaps this is why I find the tattoo ban of South Carolina so absurd. It seems outrageous that in the Land of the Free, there is a law prohibiting self expression on your very own body. No, this is not one of those antiquated laws that nobody pays attention to, like not being allowed to go hatless in public on a Sunday. No, this is a very real and every enforced law.

Sect. 16-17-700 (S.C. Code of Laws)

"It is unlawful for a person to tattoo any part of the body of another person. It is not unlawful for a licensed physician or surgeon to tattoo part of a patient's body if in his medical opinion it is necessary when performing cosmetic or reconstructive surgery."

I can't help but laugh at the image of my doctor performing a pap smear, and then scrubbing up for a "tattoo procedure". I don't know any physicians that can write a prescription clearly and I can't imagine what a tattoo by one would be like. Considering it is only permitted when deemed medically necessary, I don't suppose many will find out what creative talents their doctors may possess.

"Certainly this is not being enforced" you may say. Oh, but it is! Consider the case of Mr. Ron White. Ron is a talented and dedicated tattoo artist currently living in Florence, S.C. In 2000, WBTW-TV was filming a 3-part series on the history and practice of tattooing. The station asked White to demonstrate the process. On camera, in his own home, he tattooed the arm of a willing participant. When the program aired, the county sheriff arrested White and he was sentenced to a year in prison and a fine of $2,500. This was later reduced to 5 years of probation and a $500 fine. Now Ron White can't carry his firearms, drink in a bar, or leave the state without prior permission from his probation officer.

White appealed his conviction all the way to the S.C. Supreme Court. He contested that tattooing is an art form and should be protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court did not see it that way and on March 4th, they upheld his conviction. Undeterred, Ron's next move was on to the US Supreme Court. An international law firm, Kirkland & Ellis, took up Ron’s cause and is providing him with legal services free of charge. His lawyer is none other than Kenneth Starr who became well known when he headed up the investigation into President Clinton's Whitewater real estate development and former White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. "In a free society, this is intolerable." says Starr.

South Carolina is one of only two states that ban tattooing entirely. Oklahoma is the other.

South Carolinians who wish to get tattooed must either cross the border or do it illegally. People are doing it in basements and backrooms and this can only increase the risk of disease. Tattoo artists like White would like to see the state create health regulations for the practice to ensure public safety. They would like to be allowed to operate a business and claim that the state is only losing out on revenue to its neighboring states, N. Carolina and Georgia.

Opponents to this ban have an ally in the S. Carolina State Senate: Sen. William Mescher, R-Berkeley. Mescher says he would like to bring tattooing out of the underworld of basements and garages, and let the Dept of Health and Environmental Control regulate it. He has introduced legislation over and over for several years in an attempt to lift the ban. The medical community and DHEC support Mescher's measures, as does the Governor's office. So where is the resistance? For as long as Mescher has tried to legalize tattooing, Jake Knotts has stood in his way. Jake Knotts is a Lexington Republican who served many years in the SC House of Representatives before recently winning a special election to the State Senate. Knotts bases his opposition to tattooing on what he claims is a biblical mandate against marking the body. "It's spelled out very vividly in the Bible that tattooing is taboo" Knotts has said. "I am opposed to it and it ain't gonna pass. I'll do whatever I got to do to stop it. " It is mentalities like this that make me thankful for Separation of Church and State.

I found it hard to believe that this ban was enforced and upheld purely by personal religious opposition and attempted to find the documented reasoning behind the law. I naturally contacted Sen. Mescher's office and expected the usual brush off. Not the case. I was helped by Sen Mescher's very informative assistant, Debbie Griffin. Not only did I get her direct phone number and email address, she also faxed over countless documents and articles. I was surprised to see that the only wording documented is the brief paragraph of text that I listed above (sect 16-17-700). There is never any mention as to WHY this ban was approved. It is assumed that it was originally a health concern. In the 1960's nearly all states banned tattooing after a hepatitis outbreak was blamed on a dirty tattoo parlor in New York. By the 1980's those prohibitions had all vanished, except in S. Carolina and Oklahoma. It is ridiculous to think that you can pierce any imaginable body part and ride your motorcycle without a he lmet but you cannot adorn yourself with a tattoo in S. Carolina.

Tattooing is an ancient art form that can be traced back to Egypt 8,000 years ago. Celtic tribes used plant pigments for tattooing in early cultures and the oldest proof of tattooing can be found on the body of a 5,300 year old "iceman". Tattooing is the oldest form self expression and individuality. In modern day America tattoos have progressed from the bad-ass-biker-gang image to a more main stream and even chic persona. The fastest growing category of tattoo clients in America is the suburban upper class female aged 35-45 years. Not quite the same clientele you'd see in tattoo parlors of the 50's and 60's. Thus, most parlors today are the high tech and sterile environments that this new clientele would prefer and expect. There appears to be little risk that tattooing presents a serious problem in public health. According to a dermatologist in the Federal Office of Cosmetics and Colors the most common problem with tattoos is not infection but dissatisfaction. As for myself, I am completely satis fied with my own tattoo. Not only with the artwork itself but also with the artist, Jen Billings, and the clean and friendly parlor: "Atlas Tattoo" of Portland, OR. I could not imagine having to go across state lines or in some back alley to have it done.

For Ron White and Ken Starr, the legal battle continues. On October 7th the U.S. Supreme Court denied to review the case. Their case is now pending in Federal Habias Court. In the meantime, there is some hope of repeal through the legislative process. Previously, Sen. Mescher's bill would pass only to die in the House at the hands of Rep. Knotts. Now that Jake Knotts was elected to the state senate in April, there is little opposition left in the House.

If you are reading this and living in S. Carolina, I would suggest you contact your local congressman and voice an opinion on this ban. For Ron White the road to justice must seem long and frustrating. He will continue his probation restrictions and wait for the day he can actually ply his trade as a valid businessman and recognized artist.

Until then, the 1st Amendment will protect the art but jail the artist in S. Carolina.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrat; dnc; law; liberal; power; republican; tattoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last
To: CWRWinger
Do you consider yourself a pagan or heathen?

No. Do you consider me one?

-ccm

81 posted on 12/02/2002 11:41:36 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
Please show me a pagan or heathen nation in the history of the world which has enjoyed the liberties we have enjoyed in the USA. You know what? You can't.

You're right. And you know what? I don't think I can point to any other Christian nation which has enjoyed all our liberties either. We are unique and supreme among all nations regardless of religion.

-ccm

82 posted on 12/02/2002 11:44:30 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
I thought you were agreeing with the senator's interpretation of Leviticus.

Where does Senator Knotts quote Leviticus? You didn't get that from the article. You are making assumptions, among them that tattooing is 'normal' behavior.

83 posted on 12/03/2002 3:21:31 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
I assume this means you cannot cite any Biblical support for your view; you just have a feeling

I can cite Biblical references to support my belief that tattooing is a manifestation of heathen and pagan behavior. I studied this subject in depth with others about 30 years ago.

There are posts on this thread have stated good positions on the subject.

No, my belief on this issue is not based on feelings.

People who get tattoos want to feel like they are a part of the world system and do not wish to be identified with Christianity, which overwhelminly rejects the diliberate disfiguration of the human body.

ICor. 6:19 "What? Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost, which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?"

I Cor. 3:17 "If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy..."

I find no indication in the Old or New Testaments that the righteous got tattoos. The only marks received on the body of these saints were from beatings from persecution.

In the end times, the heathen and the pagans will willing accept the mark of the beast. The Christians will reject this mark and die because of rejecting it.

84 posted on 12/03/2002 3:44:15 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
It's a state issue, but I wish SC the best of luck in repealing this law

Please stay in Michigan with the other yankee pagans.

85 posted on 12/03/2002 3:47:56 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Do you consider me one?

From what little I have read of your comments, and since you are asking me for an opinion based on two dimensional FR posts, I would have to say "Yes".

Proverbs 14:9 "Fools make a mock at sin,.."

86 posted on 12/03/2002 4:04:15 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
I don't think I can point to any other Christian nation which has enjoyed all our liberties either.

The society and culture of the USA has more closely conformed to Biblical standards than any other so called "Christian" nation. That is why we have more liberty. The closer a nation conforms to Christianity, the more liberty there will be for all.

87 posted on 12/03/2002 4:08:23 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
OK ... let's see it.
88 posted on 12/03/2002 4:18:53 AM PST by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama
Sorority girls cap their teeth.
89 posted on 12/03/2002 6:31:09 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
The nice thing about the piercing craze is that there's one needle at a time, and easier disinfecting. Also, the hole grows closed or is of minor notice once the jewelry is removed. Not so with the mutilating tattoos--you have to endure surgery and other unhappy treatments and it's not all that effective. There are few blood vessels in earlobes, but you can hurt some nerves by peircing the tongue.

The worst tattoos (other than the ones on faces) are on the hands. Hard to conceal the hands, and hard to repair the damage.

90 posted on 12/03/2002 6:34:28 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
I find no indication in the Old or New Testaments that the righteous got tattoos.

I find no indication there that they did pushups, either. Does that make doing pushups a heathen activity? God help the Marine Corps...

91 posted on 12/03/2002 7:58:14 AM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
Does that make doing pushups a heathen activity?

LOL!! Nothing like a little humor once in a while.

92 posted on 12/03/2002 8:45:08 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
What a presposterous argument. If your tax dollars do not go to regulate the parlors, they will go to the cops you pay to shut them down, in vastly greater amounts. Try again.

So I take it you have these figures somewhere so I can compare them?

93 posted on 12/03/2002 9:50:12 AM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Look on the bright side, while you may not get a tattoo in your state, you can get an abortion.
94 posted on 12/03/2002 10:00:06 AM PST by fifteendogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Nice reply. So, do you have pierced ears or not? If so, how long have you had those temporary holes?
95 posted on 12/03/2002 1:40:20 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: error99
LOL. Since it's almost identical to a SAS rose, you would really have to be on the Board of Directors to be eligible for a view.
96 posted on 12/03/2002 7:52:31 PM PST by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
He contested that tattooing is an art form and should be protected by the First Amendment.

The First Ammendment was designed to protect political speech not art.

97 posted on 12/03/2002 7:57:10 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
Credentials, credentials - now where did I put those credentials...
98 posted on 12/04/2002 3:38:26 AM PST by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson