Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S. Carolina: No Tattoo's Here!
CAPITALISTCHICKS.COM ^ | FR Post 12-1-2002 | Debbie Brannigan

Posted on 12/01/2002 1:24:01 PM PST by vannrox

S. Carolina: No Tattoo's Here!

Debbie Brannigan (Email Author)

"Never say never". That has been my mantra these days. Ten years ago it seems I had a never ending list of things that "I'll never (fill in blank)". One of those was "I'll never get a tattoo." I would have sworn to it back then. Well here I am, in my late 30's, getting a tattoo. It was not a rash decision made while finishing off rounds of tequila in the bar. No, actually, it was a very long thought process with much research. Those who know Tara and me personally know that we had a very rough and challenging time just a few years back. This tattoo was a personal marker of that time and how we came through it. Like most people who get tattoos, it is a very personal statement that marks a significant chapter of your life.

Perhaps this is why I find the tattoo ban of South Carolina so absurd. It seems outrageous that in the Land of the Free, there is a law prohibiting self expression on your very own body. No, this is not one of those antiquated laws that nobody pays attention to, like not being allowed to go hatless in public on a Sunday. No, this is a very real and every enforced law.

Sect. 16-17-700 (S.C. Code of Laws)

"It is unlawful for a person to tattoo any part of the body of another person. It is not unlawful for a licensed physician or surgeon to tattoo part of a patient's body if in his medical opinion it is necessary when performing cosmetic or reconstructive surgery."

I can't help but laugh at the image of my doctor performing a pap smear, and then scrubbing up for a "tattoo procedure". I don't know any physicians that can write a prescription clearly and I can't imagine what a tattoo by one would be like. Considering it is only permitted when deemed medically necessary, I don't suppose many will find out what creative talents their doctors may possess.

"Certainly this is not being enforced" you may say. Oh, but it is! Consider the case of Mr. Ron White. Ron is a talented and dedicated tattoo artist currently living in Florence, S.C. In 2000, WBTW-TV was filming a 3-part series on the history and practice of tattooing. The station asked White to demonstrate the process. On camera, in his own home, he tattooed the arm of a willing participant. When the program aired, the county sheriff arrested White and he was sentenced to a year in prison and a fine of $2,500. This was later reduced to 5 years of probation and a $500 fine. Now Ron White can't carry his firearms, drink in a bar, or leave the state without prior permission from his probation officer.

White appealed his conviction all the way to the S.C. Supreme Court. He contested that tattooing is an art form and should be protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court did not see it that way and on March 4th, they upheld his conviction. Undeterred, Ron's next move was on to the US Supreme Court. An international law firm, Kirkland & Ellis, took up Ron’s cause and is providing him with legal services free of charge. His lawyer is none other than Kenneth Starr who became well known when he headed up the investigation into President Clinton's Whitewater real estate development and former White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. "In a free society, this is intolerable." says Starr.

South Carolina is one of only two states that ban tattooing entirely. Oklahoma is the other.

South Carolinians who wish to get tattooed must either cross the border or do it illegally. People are doing it in basements and backrooms and this can only increase the risk of disease. Tattoo artists like White would like to see the state create health regulations for the practice to ensure public safety. They would like to be allowed to operate a business and claim that the state is only losing out on revenue to its neighboring states, N. Carolina and Georgia.

Opponents to this ban have an ally in the S. Carolina State Senate: Sen. William Mescher, R-Berkeley. Mescher says he would like to bring tattooing out of the underworld of basements and garages, and let the Dept of Health and Environmental Control regulate it. He has introduced legislation over and over for several years in an attempt to lift the ban. The medical community and DHEC support Mescher's measures, as does the Governor's office. So where is the resistance? For as long as Mescher has tried to legalize tattooing, Jake Knotts has stood in his way. Jake Knotts is a Lexington Republican who served many years in the SC House of Representatives before recently winning a special election to the State Senate. Knotts bases his opposition to tattooing on what he claims is a biblical mandate against marking the body. "It's spelled out very vividly in the Bible that tattooing is taboo" Knotts has said. "I am opposed to it and it ain't gonna pass. I'll do whatever I got to do to stop it. " It is mentalities like this that make me thankful for Separation of Church and State.

I found it hard to believe that this ban was enforced and upheld purely by personal religious opposition and attempted to find the documented reasoning behind the law. I naturally contacted Sen. Mescher's office and expected the usual brush off. Not the case. I was helped by Sen Mescher's very informative assistant, Debbie Griffin. Not only did I get her direct phone number and email address, she also faxed over countless documents and articles. I was surprised to see that the only wording documented is the brief paragraph of text that I listed above (sect 16-17-700). There is never any mention as to WHY this ban was approved. It is assumed that it was originally a health concern. In the 1960's nearly all states banned tattooing after a hepatitis outbreak was blamed on a dirty tattoo parlor in New York. By the 1980's those prohibitions had all vanished, except in S. Carolina and Oklahoma. It is ridiculous to think that you can pierce any imaginable body part and ride your motorcycle without a he lmet but you cannot adorn yourself with a tattoo in S. Carolina.

Tattooing is an ancient art form that can be traced back to Egypt 8,000 years ago. Celtic tribes used plant pigments for tattooing in early cultures and the oldest proof of tattooing can be found on the body of a 5,300 year old "iceman". Tattooing is the oldest form self expression and individuality. In modern day America tattoos have progressed from the bad-ass-biker-gang image to a more main stream and even chic persona. The fastest growing category of tattoo clients in America is the suburban upper class female aged 35-45 years. Not quite the same clientele you'd see in tattoo parlors of the 50's and 60's. Thus, most parlors today are the high tech and sterile environments that this new clientele would prefer and expect. There appears to be little risk that tattooing presents a serious problem in public health. According to a dermatologist in the Federal Office of Cosmetics and Colors the most common problem with tattoos is not infection but dissatisfaction. As for myself, I am completely satis fied with my own tattoo. Not only with the artwork itself but also with the artist, Jen Billings, and the clean and friendly parlor: "Atlas Tattoo" of Portland, OR. I could not imagine having to go across state lines or in some back alley to have it done.

For Ron White and Ken Starr, the legal battle continues. On October 7th the U.S. Supreme Court denied to review the case. Their case is now pending in Federal Habias Court. In the meantime, there is some hope of repeal through the legislative process. Previously, Sen. Mescher's bill would pass only to die in the House at the hands of Rep. Knotts. Now that Jake Knotts was elected to the state senate in April, there is little opposition left in the House.

If you are reading this and living in S. Carolina, I would suggest you contact your local congressman and voice an opinion on this ban. For Ron White the road to justice must seem long and frustrating. He will continue his probation restrictions and wait for the day he can actually ply his trade as a valid businessman and recognized artist.

Until then, the 1st Amendment will protect the art but jail the artist in S. Carolina.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrat; dnc; law; liberal; power; republican; tattoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: CWRWinger
South Carolina's Blue Laws

I'm probably the last generation to ever experience Blue Laws here in NC. I remember as a little kid, even early teens, everything was closed on Sunday. It was absolutely wonderful on a Sunday afternoon. Hardly any traffic out except for some folks visiting relatives and so much quieter.

41 posted on 12/01/2002 5:59:34 PM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pocat; CWRWinger
This is a states' rights issue as far as I'm concerned, not a religious or artistic issue. When enough South Carolinians are fed up with the ban, then they'll change the law. Until then, it's up to South Carolinians whether or not they ban tattoos. The Supreme Court declined to hear it, most likely because the Court doesn't see any need to hear it. I hear you can only buy liquor in those little, tiny airport bottles in SC, too, but whose business is it but the people of South Carolina?

I'm from North Carolina, and I say this tattoo ban is purely a South Carolina issue and non-South Carolinians should stay out of it. Anyone who just can't stand for their skin to be un-tattooed any longer can hop up here to NC to get tattooed, just like if I feel the overwhelming need to buy a lottery ticket, I can go to SC or VA to buy one. I have no idea how much tattoos cost, but if you've got the money to waste on one, you've got the money to travel to get one.

Having said that, I see nothing wrong with tattoos in moderation. My granddaddy had the obligatory anchor, mermaid and heart tattooed on his forearms and upper arms from his Coast Guard days and so I'm used to seeing them.

As far as tattoos being a pagan, heathen practice, well that's merely their origin. So are wedding cakes. Some of the best Christians I ever knew were tattooed. Tattoos in and of themselves aren't going to keep anyone out of heaven, that's for sure.

I think this whole thing is a tempest in a teapot, on both sides of the argument.
42 posted on 12/01/2002 6:08:13 PM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Wilmington had Blue Laws when I was growing up. I can remember everything being closed on Sundays--except for convenience stores.
43 posted on 12/01/2002 6:11:27 PM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
"...Chelsea?..."

I thought the same thing.

Give her a few years, a few broken marriages, a tanker truck or two of brown liquor...

44 posted on 12/01/2002 6:26:07 PM PST by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wimpycat
re: I hear you can only buy liquor in those little, tiny airport bottles in SC, too, but whose business is it but the people of South Carolina? )))

That's only in bars. Bartenders are allowed no artistry in SC--they can only use the little bottles with standard measured ingredients. A margarita has one full measure of tequila, and another full measure of triple sec. Too much triple sec... I wondered what the rationale was...was the legislature trying to protect the drinker as a consumer, from watered-down drinks?

45 posted on 12/01/2002 7:28:31 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"It is unlawful for a person to tattoo any part of the body of another person."

Well, that settles it then. If you want a tattoo, do it yourself!
46 posted on 12/01/2002 7:30:43 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
If you are reading this and living in S. Carolina

I am reading this and I live in South Carolina. I will immediately contact my senator, Jake Knotts, and tell him to hold the line.

By the way, somebody tell this bimbo that here in the "Land of the Free" nobody wishes to "prohibit self expression on her very own body." She is free to go anywhere outside South Carolina and express till her heart's content. We won't even hold it against her.

47 posted on 12/01/2002 7:36:10 PM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
among SC natives...(the more tatoos, the fewer teeth)...

I was born in South Carolina. Have lived here all my 49 years. Know a lot of people with tatoos who are generally ex-military. Your observations are more bigoted than factual.

48 posted on 12/01/2002 7:41:14 PM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: oldironsides
Tattoos (I've learned to spell the word) are LOW RENT and just plain disgusting. The sooner we put parlors out of business, the better. Tattoo parlors aid in the transmission of Hepatitis C due to poor hygene...and could transmit HIV. Hep C is easier than AIDs, however, due to a higher transmission rate with infected needles. Even
(toothsome) Clemson students from Nice Families can get Hep C or HIV.
49 posted on 12/01/2002 7:45:30 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama
Tattoos used to be for sailors. Now sorority girls get tattooed barbed wire around their biceps. disGUSTING.
50 posted on 12/01/2002 7:47:24 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
Single-needle tattooing was illegal in NY for a long time. I don't think it still is, but I'm not sure.

Paul Booth inks in NYC, and is the most amazing tattoo artist that I have ever seen.
51 posted on 12/01/2002 8:02:29 PM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Tattoos (I've learned to spell the word) are LOW RENT and just plain disgusting.

Barry Goldwater laughs at you from beyond the grave.

52 posted on 12/01/2002 8:07:50 PM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Take a chill pill... some very regular/normal people have a tattoo. I waited til my 30's to get one, and love my discreet rose (with stem and shading) on my hip.
53 posted on 12/01/2002 8:08:12 PM PST by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Down South P.E.; CWRWinger; Mamzelle
Yes, Leviticus is the fount of all law! Let's not hold back.

Let's bring in penalties for wearing clothes made of mixed fibers, or sowing soybeans and corn in the same field.

We should make it mandatory for menstruating women to be set apart seven days, and burn two pigeons on the church altar on the eighth day, before she can go out in public.

And the fruit trees! Damn you idolators and sinners who eat fruit from trees less than five years old! Don't you know you're sinning against God's Holy Word? You all ought to be flogged and stoned, don't you know it's right there in Leviticus?

How can you people justify bans on tattoos by referring to Leviticus, and yet not work for the implementation of every word of God's Law? This is the acid test for all true believers.

Unless you are willing to write it into law that any priest's daughter who becomes a prostitute is to be burned alive in fire, then you are picking and choosing from God's Holy Laws. You're a blasphemer and you'll surely burn in Hell for your insolence before the Almighty.

-ccm

54 posted on 12/01/2002 8:23:54 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
Barry Goldwater laughs at you from beyond the grave.

Heh heh! I had forgotten about that.

The greatest man I have ever met in person is Barry Goldwater. I saw with my own eyes the tattoo of the Smoki People on the edge of his hand.

-ccm

55 posted on 12/01/2002 8:54:27 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
I love Paul Booth's work. Everything is freehand, his design. No flash.
56 posted on 12/01/2002 9:02:31 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox
It's a state issue, but I with SC the best of luck in repealing this law.
58 posted on 12/01/2002 10:14:12 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
It's a state issue, but I wish SC the best of luck in repealing this law.
59 posted on 12/01/2002 10:14:22 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Rightly divide the Word of Truth.

Have you not heard of the New Testament? Your rant exposes your ignorance.

60 posted on 12/02/2002 3:48:50 AM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson