Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur; Polycarp; don-o
<> I am another one. KIssinger is indefensible on many levels. Prolife is one of those levels. Were he one identified as a homophobe, would he have been chosen by Bush? Nope.

Look, there are MANY Republicans he could have chosen to sweep this mess under the rug- Danforth, for one, comes to mind. Why Kissinger when he is infamous as a proabort?

Why are those who oppose killing defensless unborn the ones supposed to "get a life?"

360 posted on 11/30/2002 6:31:42 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Catholicguy
Why are those who oppose killing defensless
 unborn the ones supposed to "get a life?"


Look at it this way.  There was great umbrage taken on
these boards by one-issue Freepers when it became known
that there were homosexuals working in the Justice and
State departments in this administration.  Qualifications
never came into the discussion.  We want the best people
in the best jobs, regardless of irrelevant characteristics they
might otherwise have.  The same applies to Kissinger.
The same applied to Newt Gingrich, for that matter, who
should never have been hounded from office by the, guess
what, single issue conservatives.
413 posted on 11/30/2002 2:22:37 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson