Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Restorer
A recent seminar I attended showed that (in very round figures) a 1900 era home could store about 500 gallons of water within its building envelope before reaching a point at which mold growth would begin. A 1960 era home with wood studs can store about 50 gallons.

A modern, tight, steel-frame home can store about 5 gallons before reaching the same point.

Given the inevitability of leaks at some point, which home do you think is more likely to develop a mold problem?

It doesn't seem to make any difference as far as I can see; what counts is the excess moisture.

The less moisture a substance can absorb, the faster it will dry; what counts is finding infiltrated moisture and abating it before the insidious mold occurs (grows).

182 posted on 11/29/2002 10:11:55 PM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: Old Professer
Take it from me, moisture storage capacity makes a difference, in a real building if not in a lab.

The books and websites I've mentioned above can do a better job of explaining why than I can in this somewhat constricted format.
183 posted on 11/29/2002 10:14:34 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson