The entire interview (much longer than this small excerpt) is worth reading just to explore the disconnection from reality that Daly, a Boston College prof who refuses to allow males in her classroom, equates with a higher feminist consciousness.
Gearhart and Daly don't specify the means by which they would drive men from the planet, but one must assume that, in order to achieve their goal of a "less violent world," oceans of blood would have to be spilled, and the heavy hand of a totalitarian state be put in place.
1 posted on
11/28/2002 10:45:49 AM PST by
beckett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
To: beckett
This women is as sick and demon possessed as Adolph Hitler was.
To: beckett
Women are much more civil than men are. They don't call it a cat fight for nothing !
To: beckett
Hate speech. If we were liberals, we could call for her death.
To: beckett
Daly's wet dream!
To: beckett
Perhaps they should call her
Dr. Strangelove.
And a computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross section of necessary skills. Of course it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition. Naturally, they would breed prodigiously, eh? There would be much time, and little to do. But ah with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, I would guess that they could then work their way back to the present gross national product within say, twenty years.
Trouble is, Dr. Strangelove was satire, this 'scholar' is serious.
To: beckett
Miss Canada, in Mary Daly's world
To: beckett
My husband says: "Ten bucks says she's butch".
71 posted on
11/28/2002 11:19:03 AM PST by
sneakers
To: beckett
I recall a recent article posted here...(can't remember the title) that noted the dating and marriage scene for men in China was rather bleak and Women there had the pick of the litter given the lopsided male to female ratio...and we all know why.
81 posted on
11/28/2002 11:25:50 AM PST by
paltz
"So it doesn't sound like your vision of a separate nation for women is something you see as an interim stage" - Interviewer
A separate nation for lesbians - at least angry, bitter, ugly lesbians like Ms. Daly - wouldn't be a bad idea. ....As long as it's nowhere near the U.S.
82 posted on
11/28/2002 11:26:34 AM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: beckett
|
|
Sure. Then you'd end up with this... |
83 posted on
11/28/2002 11:27:57 AM PST by
Fintan
To: beckett
And yet a Catholic College hired her to teach. Another embarassment to my religion. What is it with these Cath-o-crats? They seem intent on killing the Church of Rome piece by piece.
I am far more worried about my church letting these people in than the most anti Catholic Protestant.
87 posted on
11/28/2002 11:30:30 AM PST by
Hacksaw
To: beckett; one_particular_harbour
This is a woman only OneParticularHarbour could love :)
90 posted on
11/28/2002 11:31:29 AM PST by
Hacksaw
To: beckett
Hello ..... hello ..... I know the markets are closed today, but first thing in the morning buy all the Wrecker and Towing Service stock you can get your hands on!!!
To: beckett
bump
To: beckett
More women, less men I am all for it. I figure at that ratio I could have about 30 wives cleaning, cooking, and yes working while I watch cable and play video games. This chick is on to something. Thin out the competition and watch me thrive.
To: beckett
Reminds mean of the science fiction B movie "A Boy and His Dog" starring a young Don Johnson before Miami Vice.
106 posted on
11/28/2002 11:49:29 AM PST by
semaj
To: beckett
How about also 10% liberal and 90% conservative?
To: beckett
115 posted on
11/28/2002 11:58:58 AM PST by
dennisw
To: beckett
You have to admire the arrogance of someone who proposes to redesign the world. Whether the 50-50 ratio of females to males is "God's design" or "the product of a billion years of evolution," it is a parameter that is unlikely to be improved upon by the tinkering of a mere mortal. To even imagine that one knows better than Nature how to run Nature is a kind of self-aggrandizement that is well into the 'insane' part of the spectrum.
It is a fundamental characteristic of the liberal mind to believe that humans are intelligent enough and moral enough to design their own societies from the top down; and furthermore that this needs to be done, preferably by Smart People like Boston College professors. But this is one of the few times that I have heard a liberal social engineer depart from the principle that people are a given. Here's one who wants to get rid of half the people before she even starts. Now that is social engineering. It's also insufferably arrogant. And nuts. To compare her to Hitler or Stalin is not at all unfair; it is precisely the same kind of arrogance.
To have put this person in a position where she could influence youth was an abomination. She is ugly; not just on the outside, but starting at her inner core. She is ugly, and evil, and arrogant. She personifies those things. She belongs not on this Earth, but in Hell.
To: beckett
Before the Socialist Demoncraps managed to close the asylums, lunatics of this magnatude were only heard by the walls of the padded cells in which they dwelled. Now the equally insane media and the criminally insane of the extreme left are airing their mad rantings as though it was some kind of discovery by inquiring minds.
Why don't we all take up a collection to fund an experiment of that ladies theory on some pacific island, with 100 lesbian women and 10 homosexual men, and scientifically test her ideas. I know, we are handicapping the experiment by excluding normal men and women, but anyone close to normal would be unlikely to volunteer, and what the h*ll is normal about this pervertesque delusion anyway?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson