To: AndrewC
Chess masters often "know" the right move to make even if they cannot articulate how they know it. As a rather accomplished Chess player, I can tell you that what Shermer is articulating is not analogous to the example he used. Analogous to the chess example would be the driving of an auto while negotiating city traffic ... the training guides the action at a 'different' (perhaps less conscious) level than contemplative thinking.
26 posted on
11/26/2002 9:06:55 PM PST by
MHGinTN
To: MHGinTN
The best scientists in the world have invariably been highly intuitive, usually using their more-logical side to confirm their intuitive 'conclusions'.
28 posted on
11/26/2002 9:14:49 PM PST by
expatpat
To: MHGinTN
Analogous to the chess example would be the driving of an auto while negotiating city traffic ... the training guides the action at a 'different' (perhaps less conscious) level than contemplative thinking.I agree. The functioning of that ability is best demonstrated in speed chess.
30 posted on
11/26/2002 9:18:18 PM PST by
AndrewC
To: MHGinTN
33 posted on
11/26/2002 9:35:22 PM PST by
AndrewC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson