Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: #3Fan
"Yet isn't the claim that the high underwater currents of that region created the structure? "

Nope, the water didn't do anything. Didn't you see the exact same structures on land nearby? The structures were above water, the humans rearranged and carved some faces on them, then, the oceans rose and covered them. (it's that simple)

138 posted on 11/27/2002 11:18:15 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: blam
Nope, the water didn't do anything. Didn't you see the exact same structures on land nearby? The structures were above water, the humans rearranged and carved some faces on them, then, the oceans rose and covered them. (it's that simple)

The scientists I saw were speaking of the currents. I didn't see any 'exact" same structures. I saw a lot of things that had some form but not to the point of forming stages. I believe that humans used the grain of the geology to form the stage. It's too uniform.

At any rate it's not really important whether the stage was formed naturally or not. The scientists speaking against this structure were doing so to prove that the place didn't have any history related to man. The faces prove them wrong. I don't include Schott in this, he was careful in his words. But I know he wouldn't repeat what he said before the faces were photographed.

142 posted on 11/27/2002 12:25:20 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson