Schott said that IF any of the features were done by humans, it was done to an already existing natural structure before it went below the waves.
He also said, "If you find anything other than what I've already been shown, I'll be on the first plane back." (...or something close to that)
I wasn't impressed with anything I saw until I saw the large carved human faces on those huge structures. Those got my attention. (I immediately thought of Mt Rushmore)
LOL Obviously. No one is claiming ancient scuba divers did it.
He also said, "If you find anything other than what I've already been shown, I'll be on the first plane back." (...or something close to that) I wasn't impressed with anything I saw until I saw the large carved human faces on those huge structures. Those got my attention. (I immediately thought of Mt Rushmore)
It's unfortunate that Schott made his statements right before the faces were photographed. He wouldn't say the same thing now, that's for sure.
Let me expand on this. Schott said he thought that any human-carved features would've been done to an already existing structure. Yet isn't the claim that the high underwater currents of that region created the structure? So it wouldn't have been created until the structure went underwater. Why would humans carve faces on something that didn't exist yet? And we know they didn't wait until it went underwater. And if the faces were carved, then the structure went underwater to be "finished" by the currents, why did the currents leave the faces intact? So if there has been only one ocean-rising event, then the whole structure was above water and made by humans. Humans may have used the natural grain of the structure to make their stages, but the ocean currents did not do it. The faces prove it.