Posted on 11/26/2002 7:57:18 AM PST by blam
Thank You. Language is the poorest of all "indicators" of who when where and when. Think about it, how long does it take a European family which moved to America before it loses all touch with European language and cultural roots. 3 generations? 2 generations? And this with modern day transportation and communication. While language links are taught in school as being important, no real archeologist relies on them as other than an afterthefact curiosity.
That being said, there are numerous links between the Hebrew of that day and modern European languages.
The scientists I saw were speaking of the currents. I didn't see any 'exact" same structures. I saw a lot of things that had some form but not to the point of forming stages. I believe that humans used the grain of the geology to form the stage. It's too uniform.
At any rate it's not really important whether the stage was formed naturally or not. The scientists speaking against this structure were doing so to prove that the place didn't have any history related to man. The faces prove them wrong. I don't include Schott in this, he was careful in his words. But I know he wouldn't repeat what he said before the faces were photographed.
I expect that it will be also. This is one of the reason that I put so little trust in the numbers, population, that are thrown around, It seems that you can't put a spade in the ground with out finding a human culture, often in the most supprising places.
Good analogy.
The 'clunk clunk clunk' you can hear from the other side of the house caused by the imbalance. As I see it, this *has* to happen to a spinning ball like the Earth as ice builds up. And computers should be able to give some very good ideas as to the how, when, where.
I think a pole shift could trigger it since everywhere there's solidified lava, there should be a slight force that wants to align with the North and South. Integrate that force everywhere on the planet and the force may be enough to overcome the static friction that keeps everything in place at the moment. (Static friction between two entities is greater than kinetic friction between those same two entities by the way). But that's something I thought of two days ago and haven't seen anyone else with that theory. Scientists believe that our core is getting ready to flip it's poles. If it happens within the next few decades, we'll see. There may not be enough ice built up to get it going though since there's no land on the North Pole. Of course Geenland is pulling.
The one big question to me is, what about the acceleration from such a momentum change? Wouldn't that destroy all buildings, throw people miles, etc?
The ancient accounts say it took all day for this to happen so the speed of this would not be much more than a thousand miles an hour. Imagine taking 3 hours to accelerate from 0 to 1000 miles an hour and then another three hours to go back to 0. The acceleration would not be great at all, barely perceptable. I think there would be great winds though since the atmosphere is miles and miles thick. And the friction between the crust and the mantle would cause a lot of the earth's volcanos to erupt at once. "The fountains of the earth were broken up" paraphrasing from the bible during Noah's flood. So between the wind and the rumbling ground there probably wouldn't be many buildings left standing.
We now know 'gravity' is actually curvature of the 'fabric' of the universe. Is it possible something about gravity prevents us from such acceleration changes outside our slice of 'space/time'?
There seems to be a concept of zero velocity, zero acceleration in relation to the whole of the universe. Otherwise we'd see objects moving at nearly the speed of light and maybe even dipping in and out of time.
That's because they're surrounded by another culture they adopt. They don't suddenly start speaking an Asian language. Languages have continuity, they come from somewhere.
That being said, there are numerous links between the Hebrew of that day and modern European languages.
Prove it.
Borrowings through the Old Testament don't count.
In the spirit of Thanksgiving "tookee" and "turkey". The Hebrew pronunciation for "big ole pheasant" was tookee, modern english is turkey. See a Strong's Concordance for more.
The aboriginals in Taiwan are of Polynesian origin, not Chinese.
Go look it up yourself and stop being such a self-centered arrogant little twit. I have no intention of typing many pages of examples just so you won't have to do your homework before you shoot of your oversize mouth.
That going up 1 mile per hour every 10.8 seconds. You wouldn't feel it acceleration wise. The winds would pick up all day though.
tur·key ( P ) Pronunciation Key (tûrk)
n. pl. tur·keys
1.
a. A large North American bird (Meleagris gallopavo) that has brownish plumage and a bare wattled head and neck and is widely domesticated for food.
b. A related bird (Agriocharis ocellata) of Mexico and Central America, brilliantly colored and having eyelike spots on its tail.
2. Slang.
a. A person considered inept or undesirable.
b. A failure, especially a failed theatrical production or movie.
3. Sports. Three consecutive strikes in bowling.
Idiom:
talk turkey Informal
To speak frankly and get down to the basic facts of a matter.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[After Turkey, from a confusion with the guinea fowl, once believed to have originated in Turkish territory.]
A few words that sound similar do not make a connection. You need a pattern, which means especially a pattern of change, such as the initial Ps becoming Fs (Pater/Father).
And while I'm mentioning it, explain how all these Hebrews wound up talking in languages so much like Latin.
Translation: "I got nothing."
Sorry, don't have any.
The tribes went through the Caucusus and Turkey. That's one of many examples. If you don't want to believe it then you don't want to believe it. There isn't anything I can do to prove it to you, circumstancial evidence will never mean anything to you. I think it's obvious, especially with the Scandinavian languages. They have an Hebrew accent in my opinion.
And while I'm mentioning it, explain how all these Hebrews wound up talking in languages so much like Latin.
The same way the world speaks English now. When in Rome...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.