To: JohnGalt
If your ideology is incoherent, do not blame those new to FR.
In my short time here, I have found discussion of ideology, troop movements, and a variety of other conservative concerns. I find FR informative, intriguing, humorous, and , at times, intellectually challenging. This is a problem?
Is not FREE Republic about the FREE exchange of ideas, viewpoints, anecdotes, AND conservative philosophy?
If I am mistaken, please tell me where and why.
BTW. I despise the term neo-con ( coined by Chris Mathews ), as I was raised a conservative by conservative parents whose parents were conservative. I'm sure I am not alone in this regard.
To: conservativemusician
Who told you neo-con was coined by Chris Mathews? Irving Kritsol, the father of neo-conservatism, coined the term in the seventies.
That's what I am talking about; the newbies (warning: broad sweeping generalization) have a political history of about 4 years and show zero desire to learn about their roots.
54 posted on
11/26/2002 9:17:12 AM PST by
JohnGalt
To: conservativemusician
neo-con as defined by the NEO-COM?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson