Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Orangedog
. . there is only one parent with a child support obligation that is presumptively subjected to a child support order.

This is true, and it is presumably related to an obligation established under the federal/state child support program for a dependent child. If there is no findings on the record of dependency, there can be no "absent parent" under that program, and the court would have no jurisdiction of such a cause. The reason you can find no published appellate opinions is because jurisdiction was properly desided at the district court level, or nobody has brought such a motion and appealed an adverse desision. I wouldn't say it's a matter of practice, without seeing such a case that was pressed on that particular issue, as we are now attempting to do here in Minnesota. I have seen a case remanded back to the district court for findings of dependency. I'll find you the case if you're interested.

45 posted on 11/27/2002 1:13:41 PM PST by right2parent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: right2parent
I have seen a case remanded back to the district court for findings of dependency. I'll find you the case if you're interested.

Please do. I spent a couple of hours today on lexisone.com looking up recent cases...That site comes in handy.

46 posted on 11/27/2002 4:39:22 PM PST by Orangedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson