Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chancellor Palpatine
You have a point, but my take on what's happening is that people with a liberal axe to grind are publicizing the flag issue for a couple of reasons:

1. It salves their consciences in a weird sort of way, or at least means they don't have to reject their entire world view. They didn't lose because their philosophy and concept of government is bankrupt -- they lost because of the hostility of a bunch of knuckle-dragging, ignorant, hateful, racist, neo-Confederate yahoos. Yeah! That's it!

2. More importantly, if they can hunt out and publicize the few die-hards out there, then they may be able to sabotage Perdue's administration.

Certainly there are folks who believe that the flag issue carried the day. I believe they are unwise if they allow liberal Democrats to publicize their views for their own purposes.

I hate the new flag both because it is extremely ugly and because Barnes did a very improper thing in the way he handled the flag issue under cover of darkness, so to speak -- there should be a referendum as there was in Mississippi, and let the chips fall where they may.

66 posted on 11/26/2002 6:19:24 AM PST by AnAmericanMother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanMother
What did the pre 1954 flag look like? Was it in the mix?
68 posted on 11/26/2002 6:24:10 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson