Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ancesthntr
Thank you for your informative post. I didn't mean to infer that MY personal interpretation of the Second Amendment posits that it pertains exclusively to military arms. I was conveying - or at least trying to - the general thrust of Miller. One thing about Miller himself; I can't cite a source on this, but vis a vis the proverbial "somewhere," I read the man failed to appear in court because he died before the case came up.
29 posted on 11/26/2002 7:49:41 AM PST by Basil Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Basil Duke
Re: your take on Miller: I had a feeling that you were just giving a summary interpretation. Obviously, you read and understood the case. BTW, take a look at the 5th Circuit's Emerson decision of last year for a GREAT read on the 2nd Amendment and Miller.

Re: Miller himself, I believe that he was freed after the appellate court decision, but I'm not sure that he died in the intervening time until the USSC case. I am pretty sure that the other guy charged with him died. In any case, it hardly matters, as the gov't lied to the Court and no one was there to refute the lies.

36 posted on 11/26/2002 2:48:20 PM PST by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson