You're both right and wrong.
Everyone has inalienable rights granted by their Creator. Even those in Mexico were granted those right. They came from God, not a piece of paper like the Constitution.
However, our Constitution is one of the few in the world that recognizes the source of rights and attempts to form a federal government intended to possess only extremely limited powers. Powers that are not to be used to violate - but to protect the rights of its citizens.
However, our Constitution is one of the few in the world that recognizes the source of rights and attempts to form a federal government intended to possess only extremely limited powers. Powers that are not to be used to violate - but to protect the rights of its citizens.
Let's put it this way -- people have indeed been given "inalienable rights" (no pun intended, eh?), however it doesn't exactly given them the right to pull up a chair at your kitchen table, does it? Of course there are those in Mexico who not only believe they have a right to be sitting at YOUR kitchen table -- they want their own bedroom in YOUR house permanantly...
THE big question: Why would Dubya agree to give ANY illegal squatters citizenship??