Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S., Mexican legislators discuss border vigilantes - States may stop groups targeting illegals
Associated Press ^ | November 24, 2002 | Associated Press Staff

Posted on 11/24/2002 2:06:29 AM PST by MeekOneGOP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last
To: DoughtyOne
Excuse me, but it is not the job of the United States to solve crimes taking place in Mexico.

LAcking a police state here, others want to import it, full with jurisdictional and sovereign conflicts of interests. And we let them do it.

41 posted on 11/24/2002 7:05:04 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
Look how the Mexican government treats people along the border (they wouldn't even let them keep their wooden pallets so they could build new homes):

November 12, 2002
Squatters' Homes Torn Down in Cd. Juárez's Lote Bravo

On November 11, 2002, in the Ciudad Juárez neighborhood of Lote Bravo, more than 50 houses made of wooden pallets and cardboard were torn down by city employees using pipes and crowbars. The city workers engaged in razing the homes were from the Departamento de Regulación de Asentamientos Humanos (Department for the Regulation of Human Settlements) and were backed up by local police agents.

Reactions varied as the destruction of the homes took place. At least one man was arrested by police and other people complained about the loss of their investments.

Edel Alberto Arroyo, one of the Lote Bravo squatters, told the Cd. Juárez newspaper El Diario that residents should have been given the opportunity to save their pallets. El Diario estimated that each dwelling was worth approximately 1,000 pesos (nearly US$100) because wooden pallets sell for 15 pesos (US$1.50) each.

42 posted on 11/24/2002 7:06:22 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
If they don't enforce the laws the people support, how can they be surprised if the people take the law into their own hands?

Vigilantism is an obvious and regrettable consequence of government malfeasance. Now, predictably, some in government focus on vigilantes as the problem; not themselves and not the Illegals.

Should the government turn on the people in favor of Illegals, what do you suppose is the next logical outcome?



43 posted on 11/24/2002 7:11:36 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
New Mexico state Sen. Mary Jane Garcia said vigilante groups appeal to undereducated young men

Funny, I heard many are retired police officers and others who are educated. That means, they're also not "young men." And, if they're property owners protecting their properties and families, they are obviously working and paying taxes....productive US Citizens protecting themselves and their rights under the Consitution.....since our government has seen fit not to follow its prime directive: secure the borders.

44 posted on 11/24/2002 7:20:13 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I've read that so far the "vigilante" groups are only protecting private property and are there by invite. How can the Mexican government demand that Americans NOT be allowed to remove trespassers from their own property? I can see the danger if citizen groups start trying to stop immigration in other ways ---but we have a right to protect our property.
45 posted on 11/24/2002 7:22:04 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
How can the Mexican government demand that Americans NOT be allowed to remove trespassers from their own property? I can see the danger if citizen groups start trying to stop immigration in other ways ---but we have a right to protect our property.

You're thinking like an American, not a politician.




46 posted on 11/24/2002 7:26:55 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Right now, the politicians only have to worry about "vigilanties" on the border. If this illegal immigration keeps up, they will soon have to worry about them in every city and town in America.
47 posted on 11/24/2002 7:34:09 AM PST by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Should the government turn on the people in favor of Illegals, what do you suppose is the next logical outcome?

Needs to be repeated.

Mr. Cannell said Arizona legislators will likely take up the issue of vigilante groups during the state's next legislative session.

OK, Legislators, what outcome are you looking to promote?

48 posted on 11/24/2002 7:50:18 AM PST by Sal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4; ValerieUSA; Republicus2001; joltinjoe; KSCITYBOY; GlesenerL; montag813; muir_redwoods; ..
ping
49 posted on 11/24/2002 7:55:24 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
There was a similiar attempt to criminaize a group at the San Diego airport who made life more difficult for alien smugglers. While the rest of us had to show ID to board a flight the airlines did not require this of illegals. Only the person holding all their tickets would be checked. It was a hard fight with the govt. lining up on the side of the illegals but the action to stop the illegals worked. Smugglers not use the airport anymore.
50 posted on 11/24/2002 8:01:24 AM PST by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Mr. Cannell said Arizona legislators will likely take up the issue of vigilante groups during the state's next legislative session. The Democrat said he was "strongly opposed" to the groups.

New Mexico state Sen. Mary Jane Garcia said vigilante groups appeal to undereducated young men who feel that state and federal governments haven't done enough to protect towns along the border.

These legislators are either grossly ignorant of the Reconquista movement, or are guilty of supporting it.

Mr. Cannell is my representative, in his case he is not worried about votes, he doesn't have to be, he is well known in the area, and very popular, he will be re-elected until he is term limited. In some areas he is very uninformed, many times his opinions are emotion based, this seems to be one of those times. He is educatable in some areas, but I don't think this is one of them.

51 posted on 11/24/2002 8:03:46 AM PST by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavy
It will be a RICO action filed by our govt. against our citizens. The illegals will end up owning these peoples ranches. Get out of the way little people, the NWO of the Bush family is coming through. Get out of the way or you will be squashed like a bug.
52 posted on 11/24/2002 8:04:11 AM PST by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom
Ruby Ridge and Waco ring a bell? They can do anything the damn well please. And they will.
53 posted on 11/24/2002 8:06:07 AM PST by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
The logical progression of this is that an illegal can walk by your home decide he likes it and wait until you leave and move in. By the govts. reasoning you will then be unable to regain possession. Next step will be to forbid door locks as being inhumane to those desiring to enter your home illegaly. I bet they are trying to figure out how to sell something like this to the sheep.
54 posted on 11/24/2002 8:14:05 AM PST by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
BTTT
55 posted on 11/24/2002 8:15:08 AM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sal
OK, Legislators, what outcome are you looking to promote?

I wonder if they will actually decide Americans have no private property rights anymore, that if someone's on your property, you must allow them be stay on it?

56 posted on 11/24/2002 8:17:33 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: willyone
Seems to me that when a government ignores its citizenry and tolerates Illegal Aliens, the logical consequence is civil war.

As in Kosovo and "palestine."



57 posted on 11/24/2002 8:18:20 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: willyone
Or an illegal can by a few wooden pallets and build himself a little home on your property and you cannot do a thing about it. It seems the "vigilante" groups sprang up because people were tired of their chickens and livestock being killed for food and their properties strewn with diapers and other trash.
58 posted on 11/24/2002 8:20:08 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I read your post and it was quite good. I hardly hate to diminish it with a simple matter such as this, but would you kindly post your messages in black, not in blue.

If everyone were to start posting in multi color (throwing in smily faces even, arrggghh) this board will get real messed up and hard to read. You know, like those kiddie boards.

Thanks.
59 posted on 11/24/2002 8:29:41 AM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing

60 posted on 11/24/2002 8:32:27 AM PST by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson