Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: al_possum39

What's the difference between that and selling real estate.

None at all, for "selling" real estate is a activity of commerce the activity of exchange being taxable as an "indirect" tax against property involved in that taxable "exchange". Merely holding ones own property for ones own use is not involved in an event nor an exchange with another, thus is not subject to an indirect tax for lack of an "activity" against which a tax may be levied.

Therein lay the distinction between indirect and direct, commerce is taxable under an indirect tax as it invokes relationship between individuals engaged in a taxable "exchange" or "event". Ownership of property not engaged in an "exchange" or "event" between persons is a direct tax on ownership by one person alone.

56 posted on 11/24/2002 4:20:29 PM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: ancient_geezer
Okay. I think I see what you are saying. A tax on any exchange of property is indirect. So the fix in the sixteenth was unnecessary.

Okay then I was wrong about an amendment being required for the NST.      'preciate the info.

59 posted on 11/24/2002 4:33:30 PM PST by al_possum39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson