Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale; Junior; VadeRetro
Thank you for your posts, all of you! I'm responding to RightWhale here and pinging y'all because I think it is applicable to the questions each have raised about my "lawn" remark.

As to the lawn model: Is it likely that there was first a living organism and that everything living descended from it?

My understanding is that fossils generally cannot provide tissue to map DNA information. If that is the case, and if this research project stays away from making projections based on evolution theory, what they'll end up with is a huge database with specific genetic information (which is also huge) on each and every known type of creature - plus a few that are now extinct.

Therefore, I do not see where this can project will have the database to graph a "tree" which has time vertically and morphology horizontally. It would be based on available genetic information.

But using that information, I can see them sorting, parsing and matching the database to look for genetic matches. If the resulting chart is genetic information vertically and morphology horizontally - I personally think it'll look like a "lawn."

Just my two cents...

47 posted on 11/23/2002 12:24:56 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
Ouch, a brutalized sentence. Let me reword:

Therefore, I do not see where this project will have the database to graph a "tree" which has time vertically and morphology horizontally - because the graph would be based on available genetic information as opposed to fossils.

48 posted on 11/23/2002 12:29:40 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson