If that were true, you would think the hundreds of thousands of biologists that have worked in the field since Darwin's time would have figured it out. What I really think is that evolution is science and you simply cannot handle the concept because of the impact it would have on your psyche. That's why you and your friends constantly post "evolution is not science" or "Darwinism is dead" without a shred of evidence that this is what the scientific community believes. Hell, half the articles in biology in any layman-level magazine (Discover, Scientific American) have some implications for evolution, and none of them are negative. I've seldom tried to actually tackle biology papers from peer-reviewed journals, but I'm fairly certain that if one or another came back and said "Evolution is bunk, we found proof that God did it" the layman-level publications would pick it up pretty damned quickly.
Creos remind me of my college philosophy teacher back in the mid '80s. This fellow kept going on about "when the revolution comes..." and then spouting 60s flower child drivel. Well, his wish has never been fulfilled and probably never will be, and the same can be said for yours.
... do not care a hoot about Darwinism. Else they would not be constantly showing it to be false - as I and others have shown on these threads. A good example is that almost as soon as evolutinists postulated that the DNA not in genes was junk biologists shot it down and PROVED that it was not. Only a small band of fake 'scientists' sucking on the government teat pay any attention to it. In addition, science is about truth, not about authority. The very attempt of evolutionists to turn it into an ideology shows that evolution is not science.