Ok. I have no real argument with that view. It kind of obviates the need for a separate theory of Intelligent Design, however.
The argument here is whether science supports ID or evolution.
Science supports what science finds. In support of evolution, it has the fossil record, DNA, and speculation. In support of ID, it has speculation.
Evolution is ahead on points, but it's not even the end of the first quarter.
Religion is holding its own, but it's playing in another stadium.
Nope. Science has been politicized by the left - and that means the evolutionists.
Science is about truth, not about materialism as it has been turned into by the atheists. Even then, the Universe, the origin of life and human development are believed by science to have been designed. As to the fossils, they do not prove evolution, the Cambrian is unexplainable and the huge gaps are also unexplainable. DNA disproves evolution, period. In no way does it prove evolution.