You have unmitigated nerve. Dembski in no way considers any of those possibilities achievable without an intelligent designer having accomplished them. It is his conclusion and I underlined it for you and for the lurkers:
How does one make sense of these possibilities in light of intelligent design? Clearly, none of these possibilities makes sense without some directed coordination.
So not only did you dishonestly try to imply that Dembski believed that abiogenesis is possible but you have the nerve to continue making the assertion after it has been pointed out to you. There is only one word for you and what you are doing.
You're reading Dembski's mind, I'm only reading his words.
So not only did you dishonestly try to imply that Dembski believed that abiogenesis is possible but you have the nerve to continue making the assertion after it has been pointed out to you. There is only one word for you and what you are doing.
Well, I'm expressing my opinion (which is, of course, more than one word), but that's probably not what you had in mind. :)
So, while you're in a good mood, why don't you explain the relationship between ID and God? Dembski seems to have to deal with the beginning of life in the same manner that some of the evolutionists do -- that is, God started it, then ID (or evolution) took over.
So, with ID, if God started it, then ID is simply creationism with a cadre of assistants.
This is a discussion, by the way. Feel free to discuss.