Try this one. (Linked the wrong section earlier.)
Problem was not the link, I saw the part you intended, problem is that the source (TalkOrigins) is not telling the truth. As I have said, the different evolutionary trees by different evolutionists have vast differences. Below is an example of how big they are just in regards to the fairly small amount of items (and widely divergent ones at that!) in the Cambrian phyla:
Alternative Views of Metazoan Pylogeny (from Wllace Arthur, "Animapl Body Plans" page 58)
| Source | Monophiletic? | Offshoots? | Bilateria? | Protostomes & deuterosotomes | Arthopoda | Other Clusters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nursall | N | N/A | N | N | Y | M |
| Barnes | N | Y | Y | D | N | L |
| Margulis & Schwartz | Y | Y | Y | D | Y | MA |
| Willmer | N | Y | N | D | N | L |
| Barnes | Y | Y | Y | P + D | Y | M |
| Schram | Y | Y | Y | D | Y | MA |
| Backeljau | Y | Y | Y | D | Y | MA |
| Conway Morris | Y | Y | Y | P + D | Y | A |
| Raff | Y | Y | Y | P + D | Y | LM |
| Nielsen | Y | Y* | Y | P + D | Y | MA |