[Quix]

I think the MJ-12 thing has gone back and forth in terms of being "true" or not. I haven't kept up with it.

The peer review thing will be a moot issue soon enough.

Besides that, Greer has tons of quality peers of highly ranked scientists with lofty positions asserting a long list of things about this whole ball of wax.

I'm comfortable with my treatment of various qualities of evidence. Besides as I've said dozens of times. It's still difficult, too early in some respects, to filter out fact from disinformation.

But at least SOME broad strokes or themes SEEM to have plenty of validity to them.

I'm certainly not against caution and insistance on reasonable proof. But a type II error is no more saintly than a type I error.

[dinodino]

You are massively full of used food, my friend. What is this, "it's too early to filter out," "broad strokes or themes SEEM", "goes back and forth in terms of being 'true'," stuff? Please. Open your mind and use your brain when you're reading crap by von Daniken, Strieber, Cooper, et al. These guys prey on the gullible.