Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons
A stereotype is a general truth. One can always find exceptions to it. The fact that they are exceptions proves the stereotype in the general case. This should suffice to answer must of the drivel in your last post.

Rh- blood was clearly much more predominant in all Europeans 2000 years ago, just like blonde and red hair and blue eyes were. It has tended over time to die out because it is a recessive trait.

I'm still waiting to hear just who all these vastly different people invading Britain were. Last time I travelled the North Sea coast, people in Antwerp, Frisia and Hamburg and Oslo looked pretty darn similar. And gosh if they didn't look similar to people in East Anglia, Inverness, and Edinburgh.

The Nordics are clearly much more widespread than just Scandanavia. Nordic refers to the phenotype of humans who are tall, long headed, blonde/red-blonde hair, and blue eyes. There are plenty of these to be found in Holland, France, England, Scotland, Germany, Lithuania, Ukraine, Russia, etc.

The vast majority of Spaniards are Celto-Iberic. The numbers of Greeks, Romans, and Germans (Vandals) who moved in are infinitesimal compared to the base population. Why is this so hard for you to grasp? 5 million Spaniards easily overwhelmed the genetics of 50,000 Vandals, just as did the Alpine type Celtic northern Italians to the minority German Lombards. Small groups of conquerers such as you site are inevitably subsummed and rarely make a significant alteration in the base population genetics. A significant alteration takes a sustained settlement effort (as with the Germans in Prussia, Silesia, and Austria), a mixing of two or more peoples in a newly settled area (as with the Norse and Gaels in Iceland), or a enormous annhilation of people (as in Russia under the Communists, or Germany after the 30 Years War).

I wish my children to marry people who look like my and my wife's families, who have the Catholic faith, and simiar politics. And yes, I'll raise them to think that way, regardless of whether you want to call us bigots or not. If my daughter tried to go against my wishes, I'd politely but firmly remind her just who she is expecting is to pay for her marriage and set her up in life and suggest she respect my wishes. As long as she is living in my house (and the same for my son), I would simply forbid them from dating people I do not approve of.

I guess you think me terribly old fashioned, but my children will not be allowed to simply do as they please. We are not followers of Alastair Crowley.

176 posted on 11/24/2002 7:42:36 PM PST by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: Hermann the Cherusker
If you're gowing to use the names of actual people, alive or dead, at least learn how to spell their names and know what they have been / are famous for. It's Aleister Crowley, dear, and he wasn't EVER " renowned " as a child rearing expert. You could have , perhaps, used Spock, Ing, and / or a plethora of newer baby / child rearing experts. Unless, of course, you 1) don't know of any 2) thought that I wouldn't know whom you were refferring to ( bad move, as I had heard of and read some of Crowley, before you were ever a gleam in your father's eye )3) you were attempting to appear funny / witty ( in which case, you failed and failed miserablly ) 4) were trying to be sarcastic.

Height has little to do with the " purity " of an ethnic group, insofar as you're trying to make it seem. Northern Chinese are historically MUCH larher than those wwho have always peopled Southern China. They aren't from different subdivisions of Asiatics. Up until quite recently, those belonging to the UPPER classes, were ALWAYS taller than those in the lower classes; especially those who belonged to the " underclass" ! Diet and genes ; but, mostly diet played the important factor in height.

You have previously claimed, as a certaintude, that due to the influx of various different peoples, into Greece, their physical characteristics changed; yet, now, NOW, you state that a handful of Italians ( think Roman army ), Austrians, and French, didn't do much of anything to the indiginous populace of ancient Spain / Middle Ages Spain ? YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS !

Earlier, you have also stated, that you can tell a Pole from a Brit, from German, etc. at 50 paces . Now, you claim that Frisians and English et al, are indistinguishable from one another. Again ... YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS !

You're dead wrong, about just about every single " fact ", that you have thus far stated as " true ", concerning physical characteristics. Your anthropological inventions are ridiculous, and okay, I'm going to have to break the net rule and just say it ... you come off sounding not " old fashioned, but like a Nazi.

Yes, there are some " truths " in steriotypes; but they are far less consitant, than you suppose. OTOH, YOU , on this thread, have just proved to be, what so many here, don't want to be associated with Conservatives !

Which Russians are you talking about ? The Slavic ones, the ones who are descended from the Germans, that Ivan the Terrible imported, the Latvians , who were taken over by the USSSR, or something other , like the aristocracy, who mingled their bloodlines with the other Royal houses of ALL of Europe ? When you finally do read something, other than the Aryan propaganda, which you've been spewing here, get back to us. LOL

Oh, so you think that you are going to be able to program your future children, into some kind of unthinking , cloned you ? And, you're going to be able to do THAT, living in society, and not in some remote, homogenious commune ? You really are just too, too funny for words! The chances are about 50/50, that you'll raise another bigot. More than likely, your future progeny ( what the world doesn't need ! ), will rebel / be turned off by your positions; though I admit that your mother ( from what you've said about her ) did a rather good job of turning you into the nasty piece of work , you've turned out to be.

BTW, I'd REALLY like to know what sources you've used, that state the crazy things you've been saying. There is little proof, as to what people looked like 2000 years ago ; let alone their RH factors...which weren't even known about, that far back.LOL

179 posted on 11/25/2002 12:19:54 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson