Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RonDog
"...if that appears to be superficial..."

It doesn't just appear to be superficial, it is superficial.

You're playing right into the hands of the pro-affirmative action, pro-hiring quotas, pro-illegal immigration, open borders advocating opposition.

Michelle Malkin is qualified to speak on the subject of illegal immigration, because she's studied the issue, she's intelligent, articulate, can think on her feet and can keep her head under pressure.

57 posted on 11/23/2002 7:54:32 AM PST by 4Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: 4Freedom; RonDog
It doesn't just appear to be superficial, it is superficial.

Yes and no.

Let's keep in mind: much of politics is very superficial. Many voters slect candidats or ballot propositions for superficial reasons.

In such a climate demagoguery is commonplace, as shameless political hacks are able to demonize their opponents (often us conservatives) based on media myths and stereotypes held by superficial voters. This is not going to change appreciably in the near future.

So, when confronted with a deck of superficial cards stacked against us, isn't it prudent to play our hand in a fashion that doesn't leave us vulnerable to superficial cheap shots?




58 posted on 11/23/2002 8:30:52 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: 4Freedom
Michelle Malkin is qualified to speak on the subject of illegal immigration, because she's studied the issue, she's intelligent, articulate, can think on her feet and can keep her head under pressure.
At least we are all in agreement about THIS part. :o)
What I would like for Hugh to ask her about is a variation of THIS question:
"Now that we have re-taken the Senate, and have the ability to implement our policies, what does the GOP do about immigration reform NOW?"
Here is a part of her answer that I would like for Hugh to explore, from:
MICHELLE MALKIN: NO MORE AMNESTIES, PERIOD
Human Events ^ | Nov. 20, 2002 | Terence P. Jeffrey
Posted on 11/21/2002 7:30 AM PST by madfly

-- snip --

H[uman]E[vents]: For the first time since 1954 we have a government totally under Republican control. What should this all-Republican government do legislatively to begin getting this problem under control?

Malkin: Well, it’s not legislative, but the first thing that President Bush should do is replace INS Commissioner James Ziglar pronto.

HE: He’s announced his resignation, but is still sitting in the office. Do you have a candidate to replace him?

Malkin: I like Pete Nuñez, who was a Bush I Treasury Department official, and who is teaching immigration law right now in San Diego. He really understands that immigration has to be treated as a national security issue first.

HE: So once Pete Nuñez becomes INS commissioner, what’s step two?

Malkin: Getting serious about fixing our deportation system. In my book, I quote the late Rep. Barbara Jordan [D.-Tex.], who headed a federal immigration reform panel several years ago. She said, and I paraphrase, that credibility in immigration policy requires three things: letting people in who deserve to be here, keeping people out who don’t deserve to be here, and kicking people out who got here illegally. As the case of sniper suspect Lee Malvo shows, our deportation system is in complete shambles.

HE: Estimates of the number of illegal aliens in the United States run as high as 11 million. Are you ready to quite literally deport every one of them?

Malkin: Yes. Either our laws mean something or they don’t.

________________

© Human Events, 2002
more

61 posted on 11/23/2002 10:03:26 AM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson