Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DARK-OF-NITE ENDANGERED SPECIES LAND GRAB EXPOSED & DEFEATED !
American Land Rights Association ^ | 11-21-02

Posted on 11/21/2002 7:52:32 PM PST by farmfriend

GRASSROOTS VICTORY !!!!!!!!

**** INCREDIBLE WIN FOR GRASSROOTS !!!! ****

DARK-OF-NITE ENDANGERED SPECIES LAND GRAB

EXPOSED & DEFEATED !

Senate Bill #990, which was a massive expansion of the Endangered Species Act combined with hundreds of millions in new land acquisition, was exposed to the light of day for the first time this week.

And thousands of grassroots activists across the country said NO WAY!

And the United States Senate heard you LOUD AND CLEAR!!!!!!!!

S. 990 could not stand up to public scrutiny this week and was NOT brought up for a vote in the Senate. The Senate just concluded its session for the year, and S.990 is right where it belongs, in the dustbin!!!

Sometimes, democracy works - YOU MADE THE DIFFERENCE!!!!

The Endangered Species Act certainly needs changes. But there should be input from the public, debate and discussion should occur in the light of day, and there should be a record of who is for and against various proposals.

NONE of that occurred with S.990. This was a dark-of-nite land grab promoted in the back rooms of Washington, DC by powerful environmental organizations seeking to:

1) greatly expand their favorite law, the Endangered Species Act,

2) convert more lands from private property to government ownership, and

3) line their pockets with more, more and more grant money from taxpayers.

S. 990 and other ideas to change the Endangered Species Act may be considered in Congress next year. But it should be done out in the open.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOUR calls, YOUR faxes, YOUR emails made the difference in demanding consideration for private property rights, multiple use of federal lands, and OPEN GOVERNMENT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Take a look at the legislative history of S.990:

***S. 990 was first approved by the United States Senate just before Christmas in 2001. It was after the last roll call vote of the year, nearly MIDNIGHT, with no debate, and voted through by "unanimous consent" - when only three Senators were present, everyone else having gone home to their home states!

***S. 990 then languished in the House of Representatives Resources Committee for ELEVEN MONTHS. Property rights activists, having been caught unprepared by the Senate's sneak action, wanted an open discussion about the Endangered Species Act in the light of day. But there were NO hearings, NO debate, NO votes, NO action on the bill for eleven months.

***Then, late in November 2002, Resources Committee Chairman James V. Hansen of Utah, who is retiring from Congress, got into "Legacy Mode." He decided to create a legacy for himself at taxpayer expense. He stuffed S.990 with pork projects for Utah. These included the James V. Hansen Shoshone Trail, which cost $2 million, and construction of a visitor center at the Bear River Bird Refuge for $11 million, which upon completion would be named after - you guessed it - James V. Hansen!

***In the wee hours of Friday morning, November 15, 2002, the second sneak attack was launched. Hansen brought S.990 to the House floor and gained approval by "unanimous consent" - after nearly every congressman had gone home, at 2:35am!

HOWEVER - because it was changed in the House, the revised version of S.990 now had to be given final approval in the Senate.

Property rights activists had been burned twice, and would not be caught again!

******** GRASSROOTS UPRISING !!!!!!!! ********

The "Big Green" enviro machine had only three days to get S.990 through the Senate, which was already packed with a full agenda of other legislation. They could not risk an open debate, which would expose S.990's flaws. They would need one more dark-of-nite "unanimous consent" sneak attack in order to slide S.990 through.

But it was not to be.

Property owners large and small, cabin owners, inholders, farmers, foresters, ranchers, miners, four-wheelers, anyone who wants to make reasonable use of their private property, or who makes recreational or commercial use of federal lands, rose up and spoke out!

For the past three days, Senate offices were swamped with calls, faxes and emails DEMANDING open discussion of changes to the Endangered Species Act!

Many Senators listened to their constituents and placed a "hold" on S.990. A "hold" places a temporary delay on legislation. With only three days in session, Monday through Wednesday, November 18 to 20, it would be enough to stop the Endangered Species Land Grab.

The Big Green enviro's point man on S.990 is leftwing Senator Harry Reid of Nevada. Reid worked desperately to convince Senators to remove their "holds" and allow S.990 to slip through without a vote or debate. But with the grassroots tide rising and the light of day shining on S.990, there was no way.

Sometimes, democracy works.

ACTION ITEM - Pat yourself on the back. YOU DID IT!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cara; environment; government; landgrab
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: farmfriend
It's been put on hold. It'll be back next year. but, in the mean time, WHOO HOOOOOOOOO.
Regards,
D.
21 posted on 11/21/2002 8:52:58 PM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Hanson wanted a legacy. As for Smith.....he is getting out of Dodge and probably wants to cause trouble.
22 posted on 11/21/2002 8:53:31 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
The pressure needs to be maintained. I believe the "hold" is only good for a year..
23 posted on 11/21/2002 8:56:54 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
You into land grab stuff??
24 posted on 11/21/2002 8:57:13 PM PST by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Distressed might be a better term than uneasy. I know it fits my feelings.
25 posted on 11/21/2002 9:04:05 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
That's not a good way to get another job.
26 posted on 11/21/2002 9:05:14 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; farmfriend
It is safe to say that 2/3 of both the House and Senate supported S 990 as well as CARA. Of those that opposed, roughly half liked both bills, but opposed them because they were "off-budget"

If you read paragraph 5 of Senator Smith's Dear Colleague letter you will notice that Pittman Robertson, as it appeared in Title 3 in CARA and Title 1 of S-990, was funded as far back as 2000. It was likely also funded in subsequent years.

In spite of what ALRA and Henry Lamb might say about expansion of ESA and S 990 creating "Species at Risk", this designation already exists. In fact, there have been Federal Grants available to private land owners for "Species at Risk" for over a year now. These are available thru the Landowner Incentive Program and Stewardship Grant Program. They will also be available this year thru the $100 million Cooperative Consevation Initiative.

27 posted on 11/21/2002 9:12:05 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
But they won't give up. We really have to now work on turning this whole government land-grab thing back.

Ever vigilent, we'll be standing watch. FRegards.

28 posted on 11/21/2002 9:24:39 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Q. How would a citizen or private organization obtain a grant?
A. Citizens could apply for a grant either from their state government or from the National Park Service, the Fish and Wildlife Service, or the Bureau of Land Management. The grants will be awarded competitively.

Q. How much matching funding would be required?
A. The citizen or organization applying for the grant would be required to contribute at least 50 percent of the cost of the project. In-kind contributions such as supplies and labor would count towards the 50 percent.

Q. What kinds of projects would be funded?
A. Projects would have to restore or conserve natural resources such as wetlands, streams and other habitat for the benefit of wildlife and people. Restoration of cultural resources or recreation facilities are funded through other programs.

Cool. So I can claim that awhile back, before they put in my subdivision, there was a pond on my land, so I can go dig a pond in my back yard (the labor) for the ducks (restoration), and the Federal government will pay me for it.

29 posted on 11/21/2002 9:44:34 PM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
"Grants will be awarded competively." Or: "Grants go to the best Grant writer."
30 posted on 11/21/2002 9:56:10 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
This is good news. The Endangered Species Act certainly shouldn't be expanded. If anything, it should be repealed.
31 posted on 11/21/2002 10:08:25 PM PST by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
Thanks for the ping my friend! This is A GOOD DAY!
32 posted on 11/22/2002 12:13:17 AM PST by Issaquahking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
I am very happy that this happened. They will not give up though.
33 posted on 11/22/2002 2:59:23 AM PST by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Also remember, our President, who wants more amnesty for
illegal aliens, happens to also be a Republican.
34 posted on 11/22/2002 3:22:36 AM PST by jragan2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
There is absolutely no conspiracy, the plan is out in the open. Please read the document titled "UN PLAN 21".

It' all there in black and white.
35 posted on 11/22/2002 4:57:45 AM PST by taxed2death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
BUMP
36 posted on 11/22/2002 5:02:42 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Uh oh, you are going to make us the next Daschle target......tee hee.
37 posted on 11/22/2002 6:15:23 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
I was trying to make a point to those who all of the time run around with their stupid tinfoil hats on, thinking how smart they are not to believe the reality.

I used to have a map, but lost it in a computer crash, that showed the corridors that will limit public access to nothing but government-approved clusters of cities. The government must first seize all public lands before they can do it. And they are patient.

That map is what got me interested in land grabs in the first place. I wonder if any FReeper still has a copy?
38 posted on 11/22/2002 6:42:29 AM PST by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
bttt
39 posted on 11/22/2002 6:59:55 AM PST by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
I'd love to see that map! Boy, that would be some interesting reading! :)
40 posted on 11/22/2002 7:09:55 AM PST by taxed2death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson