Posted on 11/20/2002 9:40:24 PM PST by chance33_98
Bandage Cost Concerns With Smallpox Vaccinations
Bandage Cost Concerns With Smallpox Vaccinations
Reporter: Silvia Castaneda
A terrorist attack involving smallpox is a real threat, but the biggest hurdle in developing a vaccination plan is not the cost - it's the bandages.
Tricia Mewbourne went to Vanderbilt Medical Center to get a bandage change. She has a sore on her arm from the smallpox vaccine.
"You see the seepage and you wonder whether it's going outside," Tricia said.
The "it" she was talking about is the live virus in the vaccine. If the virus were to escape from her arm and expose others: "Certain individuals can get fairly ill and even die from this virus."
So Tricia and other Vanderbilt study volunteers are having sores kept under double wraps, using two bandages. Bandages are changed every three days for a few weeks. Each change costs a dollar, so in a mass vaccination situation: "If you multiply that by hundreds of thousands or several thousand individuals, it could be very costly," said Dr. Tom Talbot.
And if most of the state would have to be vaccinated, the bandage cost would be in the millions. But there's no plan right now on who'd pick up that cost. It could fall on strapped local governments.
"We are not stockpiling bandages at this time, " said Dr. Allen Craig.
State Health Department epidemiologist Dr. Allen Craig said it's too early to do that, not only because of cost, but because the federal government hasn't figured out what bandage may protect best. However, if millions of bandages would be needed in a hurry, Dr. Craig said cost wouldn't be a factor.
"We will be able to pick up the cost using federal or state dollars if we need to."
In the meantime, Vanderbilt researchers said they want to test different types of bandages to see whether the cheap ones, like gauze ones that cost just a couple of cents, could protect as well as the costly ones.
Yes indeed, death is a integral part of life. One should be prepared to give it up at any time. A pragmatic view, but a honest one that is necessary.
Er... I meant that someone without AIDS who got the vaccination might transfer germs from the vaccination site to someone with AIDS. Then the person with AIDS gets the pox, and spreads it. There's a lot of monkey business goes on between a lot of folks with AIDS (and even between them and some foolhardy ones without it -- yet), if you get my drift.
You and I probably lived a lot longer and more productive lives than we would have without vaccinations. Polio killed and paralyzed a lot of children. The probable truth is that children and adults who are harmed by vaccines would probably be the least likely to survive the actual disease.
That is the subject of this thread, balancing the risks vs. the benefits of giving vaccine.
So as your doctor is probably correct that vaccination would be too risky for you, I recommend you get emergency stocks of everything you would need to survive if you had to hole up in your house for a month or so.
Not recommended. If you are pregnant, you'll need to be isolated in an epidemic, so getting uncontaminated stocks of everything you'll need ahead of time might be a good idea.
There will be a small supply of gamma globulin against smallpox to give to special cases that will provide short term passive immunity.
My guess is that pregnant women will be first on the list to receive it, but I wouldn't count on it being available in your area.
I doubt it would be smallpox itself. Altered cowpox? Synthetic?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.