Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patriciaruth
My impression is either Tancredo isn't letting us know everything (although, I certainly didn't get that impression when he spoke to O'Reilly, and I would think O'Reilly would have had the same question in his mind, and tried to find it out himself, prior to the interview, and then ask Tancredo during the interview about "it," but nothing like that happened) OR there's a reason unknown to "us" peons as to what the strategery here is, and Tancredo maybe doesn't know what that is either, and he's going full steam ahead anyways.....maybe Bush told him there's another reason he, at this time, choses not to disclose.......I don't know. I find it odd; I don't take Bush to act like this unless there's some reason for it, either.
317 posted on 11/24/2002 5:46:48 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: nicmarlo
I find it odd; I don't take Bush to act like this unless there's some reason for it, either.

A long shot: Tancredo is floating trial balloons for "W"?

I don't know, but I'd be willing to bet Tancredo's was considered a "safe" seat in the recent election, thereby giving "W" a rep that could carry the mail on a controversial issue while being far enough down the food chain the party/administration could claim deniability for his position. A hissy by "W" would make it more convincing???

FGS

326 posted on 11/24/2002 8:06:12 PM PST by ForGod'sSake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson